Compare performance (158 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Clio or Suzuki Vitara?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Clio is noticeably cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Suzuki Vitara costs 23,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,514 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara offers moderately more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Suzuki Vitara is barely faster – reaching 190 km/h, while the Renault Clio tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Vitara delivers visibly more torque with 307 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 117 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is barely lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,255 kg. The difference is around 53 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Vitara offers somewhat more boot space – 375 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 48 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Renault Clio offers barely more capacity – up to 1,176 L, about 56 L more than the Suzuki Vitara.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries barely more – 463 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 38 kg.
The Suzuki Vitara stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.
detailsThe Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
92 - 115 g/km
|
co2
0 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
|
|
Length
4,116 mm
|
Length
4,185 mm
|
|
Width
1,768 mm
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
|
Height
1,451 mm
|
Height
1,595 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,046 - 1,120 L
|
|
Payload
453 - 463 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 12.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
|
Torque
190 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 - 1,462 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Suzuki
|