VS

Renault Kangoo Compact Van vs Toyota C-HR comparison

Compare performance (122 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Kangoo Compact Van or Toyota C-HR?

Renault Kangoo Compact Van vs Toyota C-HR: Key differences

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

  • moderately cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
details

Toyota C-HR

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Kangoo Compact Van is moderately cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,961 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van offers substantially more range – reaching up to 284 km, about 218 km more than the Toyota C-HR.

C-HR

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers significantly more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 101 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 12.3 s. That’s about 4.9 s quicker.

Kangoo Compact Van

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR is only slightly lighter – 1,505 kg compared to 1,639 kg. The difference is around 134 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries clearly more – 901 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 476 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,100
C-HR

Toyota C-HR

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 223 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 66 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota C-HR and the posher C-HR+ share the same eye-catching coupe‑SUV shape, but one is aimed at shoppers after clever practicality while the other courts buyers wanting a bit more kit and a touch of swagger. We line them up to see whether the C-HR+’s extra toys justify the price bump — or if …
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.

details
r221168p
r221165p
r221166p
r221163p
r221155p
r221162p

Reviews Renault Kangoo Compact Van

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Toyota C-HR

The Toyota C-HR wraps efficient hybrid drivetrains in dramatic, European‑tuned styling and a noticeably upmarket cabin, delivering composed ride quality and easy city manners that suit style‑minded commuters and company drivers. Accept a tighter, dim rear seat, a fiddly high‑lip boot and occasional CVT grumble plus persistent warning chimes, and you get a very economical, confident little crossover that prizes individuality over outright practicality.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr

Reviews Toyota C-HR

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Sam baba
25 Apr 2026, 21:54:02

Reliability and no maintenance costs, plus a futuristic design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Prius
VS
In this DriveDuel showdown we pit the sharp, coupe‑like Toyota C‑HR against the evergreen Toyota Prius to see whether style and urban swagger can outshine outright thriftiness. Choose the C‑HR for crossover looks, punchy handling and personality; pick the Prius for class‑leading fuel economy, …
Toyota C-HR
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Toyota C-HR stands out with its striking design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers. In contrast, the VW T-Roc offers a more traditional, yet stylish approach with a focus on practicality and customizable features, catering to …
Lexus UX
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the compact crossover showdown, the Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR go head-to-head: one offers quiet, premium refinement while the other dazzles with bold styling and better value. We put them through real-world checks — styling, comfort, tech and running costs — so you can decide whether to pick …
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like the posh roommate you suddenly inherited — plush cabin, hushed hybrid powertrain and a dashboard that whispers premium — while the Toyota C‑HR plays the affordable style rebel with quirky looks and surprisingly practical packaging. Choose the LBX for serene luxury and badge …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
In the battle between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Corolla Cross, both models showcase the brand's commitment to blending style with functionality. The C-HR stands out with its bold, coupe-like design and sportier driving dynamics, appealing to a younger audience. Meanwhile, the Corolla Cross …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla
VS
The Toyota C‑HR is the flamboyant, coupe‑like crossover that trades rear-seat space for eye-catching design and a higher stance, while the Toyota Corolla is the dependable compact that serves up better packaging, comfort and efficient powertrains. If you want personality and city swagger, pick the …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris
VS
Meet the Toyota C‑HR and the Toyota Yaris: one dresses like a crossover pop star with dramatic styling and a taller stance, while the other is the compact, sensible hatchback built for city life. Choose the C‑HR for presence, space and a firmer ride; pick the Yaris for nimble handling, lower …
Toyota C-HR
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Toyota C-HR and Volvo XC40 each bring their own unique flair to the table. While the C-HR impresses with its bold design and exceptional reliability, the XC40 stands out with its premium interior and cutting-edge technology. Ultimately, the choice …
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 37,000 £
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
20.5 - 20.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
279 - 284 km
Electric Range
66 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 151 g/km
co2
52 - 116 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,639 - 1,910 kg
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,832 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
670 - 901 kg
Payload
375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 122 HP
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 14.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
245 - 270 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
70 - 90 kW
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Renault
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the Renault Kangoo Compact Van have?

The Renault Kangoo Compact Van is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.