VS

Renault Master Transporter vs Volvo ES90 comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (38,600 £ vs 69,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Master Transporter or Volvo ES90?

Renault Master Transporter vs Volvo ES90: Key differences

Renault Master Transporter

  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

Volvo ES90

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • visibly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Master Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Master Transporter is significantly cheaper – starting at 38,600 £ , while the Volvo ES90 costs 69,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31,287 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo ES90 is clearly more efficient: consuming 16.6 kWh/100km compared to 22.6 kWh/100km for the Renault Master Transporter. That’s a difference of about 6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo ES90 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 706 km, about 258 km more than the Renault Master Transporter.

ES90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo ES90 offers clearly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 510 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo ES90 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Renault Master Transporter takes 13.5 s. That’s about 9.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo ES90 delivers clearly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 490 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Volvo ES90 offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Master Transporter is clearly lighter – 2,128 kg compared to 2,610 kg. The difference is around 482 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Master Transporter carries clearly more – 1,846 kg compared to 460 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,386 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo ES90 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £69,900
ES90

Volvo ES90

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 456 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 706 km
Renault Master Transporter
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Renault Master Transporter

The Renault Master is a pragmatic workhorse that swallows cargo with an unbothered grin, offering clever practicality and load-friendly packaging for tradespeople and fleet buyers. It won’t excite like a sports car, but it steers predictably, runs economically and gets the job done day after day — like a reliable colleague who never calls in sick.

details

Volvo ES90

The Volvo ES90 stands out as a luxury sedan, embodying Scandinavian elegance combined with innovative technology. Its sleek design is complemented by a plush interior that emphasizes comfort and safety, aligning with Volvo's renowned reputation. With advanced features and a focus on sustainability, the ES90 is a testament to the brand's commitment to responsible luxury.

details
Renault Master Transporter
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

Price
38,600 - 54,600 £
Price
69,900 - 74,600 £
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 12.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
22.6 - 25.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
177 - 448 km
Electric Range
706 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 318 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
3
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,128 - 2,598 kg
Curb weight
2,610 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,080 mm
Width
1,942 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
902 - 1,846 kg
Payload
460 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Power HP
456 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 5.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Torque
670 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Power kW
335 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Renault
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.