Compare performance (158 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (24,400 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Symbioz or Mazda CX-30?
In the world of compact SUVs, the battle for supremacy has never been more intense. Two contenders have recently attracted immense attention: the Mazda CX-30 and the Renault Symbioz. Both vehicles offer a blend of style, performance, and innovation that makes them top choices for anyone looking for a modern SUV in 2024.
At the heart of the Mazda CX-30 lies a variety of engine options, including a Petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) with power outputs of 186 HP and 140 HP. These engines deliver a torque of up to 240 Nm, allowing for acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds. The CX-30 offers both manual and automatic transmissions and provides the flexibility of front-wheel or all-wheel drive. This versatility ensures adaptability for various driving conditions.
In contrast, the Renault Symbioz is equipped with a full hybrid engine that produces 143 HP and a torque of 250 Nm. It may not be as powerful as the CX-30, but it compensates with enhanced fuel efficiency. The Symbioz boasts a fuel consumption rate of just 4.8 L/100 km, making it an environmentally friendlier option with a CO2 efficiency class of C. The hybrid system also aids in maintaining a competitive edge, reaching 0 to 100 km/h in 10.6 seconds.
The Mazda CX-30 comes with a modern design reflecting its SUV designation while maintaining a sporty demeanor. It's 4395 mm long, 1795 mm wide, and 1540 mm high, providing ample space and comfort with a trunk capacity of 430 liters. The vehicle efficiently balances a curb weight of up to 1587 kg, with advanced safety and infotainment features enhancing the driving experience.
On the other hand, the Renault Symbioz isn't just about efficiency; it's also a showcase of hybrid innovation. With a length of 4413 mm, width of 1797 mm, and height of 1575 mm, it offers more room for luggage with a trunk capacity of 492 liters. The Symbioz demonstrates Renault's commitment to a sustainable future, evident in its optimized hybrid engine and eco-friendly emissions output of 109 g/km CO2.
Mazda takes pride in the CX-30's dynamic yet comfortable ride, ensuring that both short and long journeys are enjoyable. The advanced suspension system and vehicle stability technology provide a safe and smooth experience for its 5 passengers.
The Renault Symbioz, while competitive in terms of comfort, impresses with its futuristic interior and emphasis on eco-friendly driving. The integration of modern technology and user-friendly interfaces makes it a pleasure to drive, providing a serene cabin environment.
In conclusion, while both the Mazda CX-30 and Renault Symbioz offer admirable features, they cater to slightly different priorities. The CX-30 is ideal for those who prioritize a more powerful driving experience with flexible drivetrain options. Meanwhile, the Symbioz stands out as the choice for those seeking efficiency and innovation in hybrid technology. Ultimately, the decision between these two comes down to whether performance or eco-friendliness takes precedence in your SUV selection.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Symbioz is marginally cheaper – starting at 24,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 806 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Symbioz uses 4.5 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers a bit more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Renault Symbioz takes 9.1 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Symbioz delivers only slightly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Symbioz is very slightly lighter – 1,359 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 96 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Symbioz offers clearly more boot space – 576 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 146 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries very slightly more – 496 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.
The Renault Symbioz comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Symbioz feels less like a traditional car and more like a rolling living room that's been told it's allowed to drive — its flowing lines and minimalist cabin are pure concept-car theatre that teases the future of everyday transport. For buyers with an eye for design and a taste for tech-forward ideas, the Symbioz is an alluring vision of what Renault could offer tomorrow, even if it's not yet a model you can park in your driveway.
details
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,400 - 30,700 £
|
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 136 g/km
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
|
Length
4,413 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
1,575 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,682 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
455 - 459 kg
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España