Compare performance (158 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (24,400 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Symbioz or MG ZS?
The automotive industry continues to evolve, with manufacturers increasingly focusing on functionality, sustainability, and style. In the increasingly competitive SUV segment, we have an intriguing comparison between two distinct models: the MG ZS and the Renault Symbioz. Both vehicles offer innovative technology and impressive specifications, but how do they really stack up against each other? Let's delve into the details.
The MG ZS comes in various configurations, presenting options for electric, full hybrid, and petrol engines. Depending on the configuration, the ZS boasts a power output between 116 and 197 horsepower, accompanied by a flexible torque range peaking at 280 Nm. The vehicle accelerates from 0-100 km/h in just 8.6 to 8.7 seconds, depending on the model year selected.
With front-wheel drive as standard and an automatic or manual transmission option, the ZS provides a balance between functionality and performance. It features a generous electric range of up to 440 kilometers, refined through its battery capacity of up to 65.7 kWh. Efficiency is key here, with an impressive combined consumption of just 5 liters per 100 km in its petrol variant or 17.3 kWh/100 km for electric variants, meeting diverse consumer needs.
The vehicle dimensions are quite accommodating as well—measuring 4323 mm in length, 1809 mm in width, and 1649 mm in height—giving ample headroom and cargo space with a trunk capacity of 448 liters.
On the other side of the comparison, we have the Renault Symbioz, a model characterized by its full hybrid configuration. It delivers 143 horsepower with a torque of 250 Nm, achieving a 0-100 km/h acceleration in 10.6 seconds. Although this might seem slower compared to the MG ZS, the Symbioz focuses heavily on eco-friendliness and fuel efficiency, offering a consumption rate of only 4.8 liters per 100 km and low CO2 emissions of 109 g/km.
Notably, the Symbioz features an automatic transmission and front-wheel drive. While it carries a smaller engine capacity of 1598 cm3, its battery capacity of 0.6 kWh emphasizes its hybrid nature rather than a fully electric drive, which may appeal to drivers who prefer more traditional performance coupled with modern efficiency. In terms of dimensions, the Symbioz is slightly larger at 4413 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1575 mm in height, offering a more spacious trunk capacity of 492 liters.
Innovation drives both the MG ZS and Renault Symbioz forward. The ZS is equipped with a range of tech features, including advanced driver-assistance systems, smart connectivity options, and a contemporary infotainment system integrated into its ergonomic interior layout.
Meanwhile, the Symbioz is not just a car; it’s designed to be a forward-thinking space that embodies Renault's vision for mobility. With a futuristic design and attention to sustainable materials, the Symbioz signals a shift towards eco-friendly driving experiences. The advanced infotainment and connectivity within this model aim to provide a seamless integration of technology into daily life.
When comparing the MG ZS and the Renault Symbioz, it ultimately comes down to what the consumer values in an SUV. If you're looking for a vehicle that excels in performance and offers a broader engine choice, the MG ZS may be the better fit for you. However, if your focus is on sustainability and futuristic design, the Renault Symbioz positions itself as a commendable option. With both vehicles showcasing their unique attributes, the market continues to expand in the direction of innovation and adaptability.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
MG ZS is noticeably cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Renault Symbioz costs 24,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,437 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Symbioz uses 4.5 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers moderately more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 39 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Renault Symbioz takes 9.1 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Symbioz delivers substantially more torque with 265 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 117 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is marginally lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,359 kg. The difference is around 29 kg.
When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries barely more – 470 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.
The Renault Symbioz holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Symbioz feels less like a traditional car and more like a rolling living room that's been told it's allowed to drive — its flowing lines and minimalist cabin are pure concept-car theatre that teases the future of everyday transport. For buyers with an eye for design and a taste for tech-forward ideas, the Symbioz is an alluring vision of what Renault could offer tomorrow, even if it's not yet a model you can park in your driveway.
details
The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,400 - 30,700 £
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 136 g/km
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,413 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
|
Height
1,575 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,682 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
455 - 459 kg
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
MG
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España