Compare performance (158 HP vs 325 HP), boot space and price (24,400 £ vs 32,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Symbioz or Vauxhall Grandland?
In the competitive SUV segment, the Opel Grandland and Renault Symbioz have emerged as formidable contenders for consumers seeking functionality, efficiency, and innovation. As we delve into their technical specifications and features, it becomes evident that both vehicles have unique traits that cater to different preferences. Let’s explore how these two models stack up against each other.
The Opel Grandland presents a dynamic and robust exterior that measures an imposing 4650 mm in length. Its significant width of 1934 mm and height of 1665 mm contribute to a commanding presence on the road. In contrast, the Renault Symbioz is more compact, with a length of 4413 mm, a width of 1797 mm, and a height of 1575 mm. The Symbioz’s narrower profile makes it more agile, potentially enhancing maneuverability in urban settings.
When it comes to performance, the Opel Grandland offers a range of engine options including petrol MHEV, plug-in hybrid, and fully electric variants. The highest performance model boasts a power output of up to 213 HP, achieving acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in just 7.8 seconds. The electric range is impressive too, with values stretching up to 585 km for the fully electric version.
On the other hand, the Renault Symbioz is powered by a full hybrid engine producing 143 HP. While it lags behind the Grandland in terms of raw power, it still offers adequate performance with a 0-100 km/h time of 10.6 seconds, paired with substantial fuel efficiency at 4.8 L/100 km. This positions the Symbioz as a great option for eco-conscious drivers who prioritize fuel economy.
Both vehicles come equipped with automatic transmissions and front-wheel drive configurations. The Grandland’s advanced options include a dual-clutch automatic gearbox and reduction gearbox in hybrid formats, enhancing power delivery and efficiency. The Symbioz, while offering a more traditional automatic gearbox, focuses on simplicity for everyday driving.
With seating for up to five passengers, both SUVs offer similar passenger accommodation. However, the Grandland edges out in terms of luggage space with a trunk capacity of 550 liters compared to the Symbioz’s 492 liters. The spacious interior and high-quality materials of the Grandland offer a premium experience, enhancing its appeal for family outings.
In an age where technology plays a crucial role in consumer choice, both the Opel Grandland and Renault Symbioz come packed with modern features. The Grandland is designed with next-gen connectivity and advanced driver-assistance systems, making it suitable for tech-savvy drivers. Moreover, its fuel efficiency options push the boundaries of what's possible for hybrid and electric vehicles.
The Renault Symbioz, while aimed for eco-friendliness, incorporates innovations that emphasize sustainability without compromising comfort. The integration of hybrid technology exemplifies a commitment towards reducing emissions, as indicated by its CO2 efficiency class of C, producing 109 g/km.
Cost-effectiveness remains a focal point for buyers. The Opel Grandland, with a fuel tank capacity of 55 liters and alternatives for every driving need—be it petrol, hybrid, or electric—aligns well with various budgets. Its diverse powertrains cater to those willing to invest in more advanced tech.
The Renault Symbioz, with smaller fuel tank and hybrid setup, also aims at providing lower running costs, appealing to budget-conscious drivers. Its lower curb weight of 1498 kg results in better efficiency, minimizing the visits to the fuel station.
In summary, the Opel Grandland and Renault Symbioz represent two distinct approaches to the SUV market. The Grandland is a powerhouse boasting versatility, spaciousness, and a variety of engine options, suited for families and tech enthusiasts alike. Conversely, the Renault Symbioz delivers on efficiency and eco-friendliness, marking its territory for those passionate about sustainability. Ultimately, your choice will hinge on personal preferences, lifestyle, and priorities in the rapidly evolving automotive landscape.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Symbioz is clearly cheaper – starting at 24,400 £ , while the Vauxhall Grandland costs 32,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,134 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Vauxhall Grandland uses 2.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Renault Symbioz with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Vauxhall Grandland offers significantly more power – delivering 325 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 167 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Vauxhall Grandland is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.1 s, while the Renault Symbioz takes 9.1 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Vauxhall Grandland is slightly faster – reaching 202 km/h, while the Renault Symbioz tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 22 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Vauxhall Grandland delivers significantly more torque with 509 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 244 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Symbioz is clearly lighter – 1,359 kg compared to 1,675 kg. The difference is around 316 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Symbioz offers marginally more boot space – 576 L compared to 550 L. That’s a difference of about 26 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Renault Symbioz offers marginally more capacity – up to 1,682 L, about 37 L more than the Vauxhall Grandland.
When it comes to payload, the Vauxhall Grandland carries barely more – 495 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 36 kg.
The Vauxhall Grandland holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Symbioz feels less like a traditional car and more like a rolling living room that's been told it's allowed to drive — its flowing lines and minimalist cabin are pure concept-car theatre that teases the future of everyday transport. For buyers with an eye for design and a taste for tech-forward ideas, the Symbioz is an alluring vision of what Renault could offer tomorrow, even if it's not yet a model you can park in your driveway.
details
The Opel Grandland feels like a sensible, well-rounded SUV — neat styling, a spacious cabin and a composed ride that turns daily driving into a quietly pleasant experience. It’s a smart choice for buyers who want modern tech, good economy and a dash of German practicality without shouting for attention.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,400 - 30,700 £
|
Price
32,600 - 51,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 18.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
82 - 694 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 136 g/km
|
co2
0 - 126 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
|
Curb weight
1,675 - 2,325 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
|
Trunk capacity
485 - 550 L
|
|
Length
4,413 mm
|
Length
4,650 mm
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,905 mm
|
|
Height
1,575 mm
|
Height
1,665 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,682 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,580 - 1,645 L
|
|
Payload
455 - 459 kg
|
Payload
425 - 495 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 325 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 202 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 509 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 239 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, B
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Vauxhall
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España