VS

SEAT Ateca vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (25,100 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SEAT Ateca or Suzuki S-Cross?

SEAT Ateca vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

SEAT Ateca

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • a bit more trunk space
details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ateca

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki S-Cross is moderately cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the SEAT Ateca costs 25,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,343 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the SEAT Ateca uses 4.9 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the SEAT Ateca offers noticeably more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the SEAT Ateca delivers noticeably more torque with 360 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 125 Nm more.

Ateca

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is only slightly lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,345 kg. The difference is around 65 kg.

Looking at boot space, the SEAT Ateca offers a bit more boot space – 510 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 80 L.

When it comes to payload, the SEAT Ateca carries markedly more – 525 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 120 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The SEAT Ateca is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,100
Ateca

SEAT Ateca

  • Engine Type Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 6.4 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca and the VW T‑Roc are two closely related compact crossover SUVs from the Volkswagen Group, each offering a blend of practicality, comfort and engaging driving manners. This comparison will highlight where the Ateca’s straightforward value and roomy practicality differ from the …
SEAT Ateca
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

SEAT Ateca

The SEAT Ateca blends sharp, purposeful styling with practical space that turns everyday errands into something a bit more enjoyable. It’s poised and engaging to drive for its segment, offers solid value, and has just enough personality to make you smile on the school run.

details
SEAT-Ateca-2020_36_HQ
SEAT-Ateca_012
SEAT-Ateca_011
SEAT-Ateca_006
SEAT-Ateca_004

Reviews SEAT Ateca

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
Nico
20 May 2026, 12:31:33

+ Great, firm seats, large boot for such a compact car, good fuel economy, lots of interior space, uncomplicated controls, very agile and safe handling, good build quality, very good steering, good braking performance, relatively small turning circle
- Very poor voice control and navigation, cockpit display too small with very small fonts and symbols, steering wheel too thin, seats too flat despite electric adjustment, poor engine soundproofing, tank far too small, complicated maintenance (oil change appalling), undersized rear brake, fuel filler on the wrong side, sound almost without bass (Beats)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
SEAT Ateca
VS
As compact SUVs that balance practicality and value, the Hyundai Tucson and SEAT Ateca are popular choices for buyers seeking everyday comfort with sensible running costs. This comparison cuts through the specs to show which model — the Tucson or the Ateca — suits your needs better, whether you …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
CUPRA Terramar
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Terramar serves up sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a premium, slightly flashy cabin that feels like the hot hatch’s grown-up, wearing an SUV’s clothes. The SEAT Ateca is the sensible alternative — roomier, cheaper to run and refreshingly unpretentious — perfect for buyers who want …
SEAT Ateca
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The SEAT Ateca and Skoda Kamiq are two popular compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Ateca leans toward a roomier, more driver-focused experience while the Kamiq prioritizes city-friendly practicality and efficiency. This comparison will focus on space, driving dynamics, equipment and …
Nissan Qashqai
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing a compact SUV is more about lifestyle than just luggage space, and in this matchup the Nissan Qashqai brings glossy tech, a classy cabin and composed road manners. The Suzuki S-Cross counters with sensible packaging, economical engines and value that won’t make your wallet faint — which …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross is the scrappy, value-packed compact SUV — cheaper to buy, nimbler in town and surprisingly practical, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a little driving sparkle for Toyota’s famed refinement, stronger safety kit and an efficient hybrid powertrain. Pick the S‑Cross if you …
Dacia Duster
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Dacia Duster and Suzuki S-Cross offer distinct advantages that cater to different types of drivers. The Duster impresses with its affordability and rugged design, perfect for those seeking an economical and versatile vehicle for both urban and off-road …
SEAT Ateca
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,100 - 36,900 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 6.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 144 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,345 - 1,514 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
510 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,841 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
516 - 525 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 150 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 11 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,968 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
SEAT
Brand
Suzuki
What drive types are available for the SEAT Ateca?

The SEAT Ateca is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.