VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Alpine A390 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 470 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 57,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Alpine A390?

Skoda Enyaq vs Alpine A390: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
  • barely lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

Alpine A390

  • noticeably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Enyaq is significantly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Alpine A390 costs 57,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,009 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is noticeably more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 18.7 kWh/100km for the Alpine A390. That’s a difference of about 3.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 38 km more than the Alpine A390.

A390

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A390 offers noticeably more power – delivering 470 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 130 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A390 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A390 delivers a bit more torque with 824 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 145 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is barely lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,121 kg. The difference is around 47 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers very slightly more boot space – 585 L compared to 532 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries marginally more – 526 kg compared to 484 kg. That’s a difference of about 42 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A390 has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £57,900
A390

Alpine A390

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 400 - 470 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.7 - 20.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 497 - 551 km
Skoda Enyaq
Alpine A390

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details

Alpine A390

The Alpine A390 is the brand’s leap into the fast electric crossover arena, wrapping Dieppe’s lightweight ethos in a sleek, coupe-ish body with real everyday usability. If the steering and chassis feel echo the A110, this could be the enthusiast’s family EV—subtle, sharp, and très chic, with enough theatre to make the school run feel like a pit lane exit.

details
Skoda Enyaq
Alpine A390

Costs and Consumption

Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Price
57,900 - 66,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 20.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Electric Range
497 - 551 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Curb weight
2,121 - 2,124 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
532 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,885 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 526 kg
Payload
481 - 484 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
400 - 470 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 4.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
661 - 824 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
295 - 345 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Alpine
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.