VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Alpine A390 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 470 HP), boot space and price (41,900 £ vs 57,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Alpine A390?

Skoda Enyaq vs Alpine A390: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
  • very slightly more trunk space

Alpine A390

  • noticeably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Enyaq is visibly cheaper – starting at 41,900 £ , while the Alpine A390 costs 57,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,943 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is noticeably more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 18.7 kWh/100km for the Alpine A390. That’s a difference of about 3.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 32 km more than the Alpine A390.

A390

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A390 offers noticeably more power – delivering 470 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 130 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A390 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A390 delivers a bit more torque with 824 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 145 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Alpine A390 is barely lighter – 2,121 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 58 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers very slightly more boot space – 585 L compared to 532 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A390 shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £57,900
A390

Alpine A390

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 400 - 470 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.7 - 19.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 515 - 555 km
Skoda Enyaq
Alpine A390

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details

Alpine A390

The Alpine A390 is the brand’s leap into the fast electric crossover arena, wrapping Dieppe’s lightweight ethos in a sleek, coupe-ish body with real everyday usability. If the steering and chassis feel echo the A110, this could be the enthusiast’s family EV—subtle, sharp, and très chic, with enough theatre to make the school run feel like a pit lane exit.

details
Skoda Enyaq
Alpine A390

Costs and Consumption

Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Price
57,900 - 66,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 19.8 kWh/100km
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Electric Range
515 - 555 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
89 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Curb weight
2,121 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
532 L
Length
-
Length
4,615 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,885 mm
Height
-
Height
1,532 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,643 L
Payload
443 - 489 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
400 - 470 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 4.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
200 - 220 km/h
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
661 - 824 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
295 - 345 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Alpine
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.