@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Alpine A390 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Skoda Enyaq or Alpine A390?

Skoda Enyaq

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

Alpine A390

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Enyaq has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38100 £, while the Alpine A390 costs 57900 £. That’s a price difference of around 19800 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the Alpine A390 with 18.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.90 kWh.

As for range, the Skoda Enyaq performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 587 km, about 32 km more than the Alpine A390.

Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A390 has a noticeable edge – offering 470 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 130 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A390 is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 3.90 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Alpine A390 performs to a small extent better – reaching 220 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Alpine A390 pulls a bit stronger with 824 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 145 Nm difference.

Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is barely noticeable lighter – 2002 kg compared to 2121 kg. The difference is around 119 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers hardly perceptible more room – 585 L compared to 532 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1710 L, which is about 67 L more than the Alpine A390.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Alpine A390 shows itself to be edges ahead and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Skoda Enyaq
Alpine A390

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £57,900
default

Alpine A390

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 400 - 470 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.7 - 19.8 kWh
  • Electric Range : 515 - 555 km

Skoda Enyaq

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details

Alpine A390

The Alpine A390 is the brand’s leap into the fast electric crossover arena, wrapping Dieppe’s lightweight ethos in a sleek, coupe-ish body with real everyday usability. If the steering and chassis feel echo the A110, this could be the enthusiast’s family EV—subtle, sharp, and très chic, with enough theatre to make the school run feel like a pit lane exit.

details
Skoda Enyaq
Alpine A390
Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Consumption

Price
38100 - 52200 £
Price
57900 - 66900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 19.8 kWh
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
Electric Range
515 - 555 km
Battery Capacity
59 - 79 kWh
Battery Capacity
89 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
Curb weight
2121 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
532 L
Length
4658 - 4660 mm
Length
4615 mm
Width
1879 mm
Width
1885 mm
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
Height
1532 mm
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
Max trunk capacity
1643 L
Payload
457 - 509 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
400 - 470 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 4.8 s
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
Max Speed
200 - 220 km/h
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
Torque
661 - 824 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
295 - 345 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Alpine
Is the Skoda Enyaq offered with different drivetrains?

The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.

do not click