Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BMW iX1 vs Skoda Enyaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (313 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (41800 £ vs 38100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW iX1 or Skoda Enyaq?
iX1
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Enyaq has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38100 £ , while the BMW iX1 costs 41800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3771 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the BMW iX1 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs noticeable better – achieving up to 587 km, about 124 km more than the BMW iX1.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 340 HP compared to 313 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the BMW iX1 takes 5.60 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls distinct stronger with 679 Nm compared to 494 Nm. That’s about 185 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
iX1
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, BMW iX1 is barely noticeable lighter – 1940 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 62 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers somewhat more room – 585 L compared to 490 L. That’s a difference of about 95 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs somewhat better – up to 1710 L, which is about 215 L more than the BMW iX1.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq slight takes the win – 509 kg compared to 495 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
BMW iX1
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £38,100
Skoda Enyaq
BMW iX1
4.7 (3 Reviews)
The BMW iX1 wraps BMW's electric ambition into a compact SUV package that feels unexpectedly premium, with sharp handling and a crisp, modern cabin that keeps the driver in charge. It's ideal for buyers who want a stylish, quiet daily driver with useful practicality and tech-savvy touches — plus enough character to make the commute feel less like a chore and more like a short joyride.
details
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
BMW iX1
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41800 - 54600 £
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 17.1 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
436 - 463 km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
64.80 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1940 - 2085 kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
490 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4500 mm
|
Length
4658 mm
|
|
Width
1845 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1616 mm
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1495 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
495 kg
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 313 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 494 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 230 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2022 - 2023
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the BMW iX1 offered with different drivetrains?
The BMW iX1 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.