Compare performance (313 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (42,300 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW iX1 or Skoda Enyaq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the rapidly evolving world of electric vehicles, the competition is fierce, especially among manufacturers known for their innovation and quality. Two powerhouses, the BMW iX1 and Skoda Enyaq, stand out in the SUV segment, offering impressive electric ranges, performance, and state-of-the-art technology. This article dives deep into a comprehensive comparison of these two models, exploring their technical specifications and innovations.
The BMW iX1 presents a modern, robust design typical of the brand’s BMW X series. It measures 4500 mm in length, 1845 mm in width, and 1616 mm in height, providing a balanced and athletic stance that appeals to a wide-ranging audience. The Skoda Enyaq, slightly larger, boasts dimensions that range from 4649 mm to 4658 mm in length, 1879 mm in width, and a similar height around 1620 mm. This larger footprint contributes to a spacious cabin and additional cargo space.
Under the hood, both vehicles offer powerful electric drivetrains. The BMW iX1 comes with two options: a front-wheel-drive variant producing 204 HP and an all-wheel-drive version delivering 313 HP. In terms of acceleration, the iX1 reaches 0-100 km/h in just 5.6 seconds for the more powerful variant. Meanwhile, the Skoda Enyaq offers a range of power levels, from 204 HP to a sporty 340 HP, allowing for a 0-100 km/h acceleration in as little as 5.5 seconds. Both models feature automatic transmissions with a reduction gearbox, ensuring a smooth driving experience.
When it comes to efficiency, the iX1 boasts a consumption rate between 15.8 kWh/100 km and 17.1 kWh/100 km, with an electric range of up to 463 km. The Enyaq, on the other hand, excels with a wider variety of options that allow it to achieve ranges up to 587 km, with consumption figures that average around 14.6 to 16.1 kWh/100 km depending on the variant chosen. This makes the Enyaq one of the most efficient SUVs in this segment, allowing drivers longer journeys without needing a charge.
The BMW iX1 is equipped with a battery capacity of 64.8 kWh, while the Skoda Enyaq offers two battery options: a 59 kWh variant and a larger 77 kWh variant. The faster charging times provided by both make them appealing choices for those conscious about charging infrastructure. The Enyaq’s larger battery capacity means fewer stops during long travels, providing greater flexibility for drivers.
Both vehicles cater to families and those needing space with a similar seating capacity of five. The iX1 offers a trunk capacity of 490 liters, whereas the Enyaq surpasses it with up to 585 liters. This added space in the Skoda enhances practicality, especially for those who frequently travel with luggage or equipment. Interior features in both models include advanced infotainment systems, allowing seamless connectivity and navigation.
Both the iX1 and Enyaq prioritize safety, featuring multiple airbags, advanced driver assistance systems, and top-rated crash test results. BMW’s iX1 comes with adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assistance, and park assist, while Skoda embraces a comparable suite of safety technologies, including adaptive lighting and a parking assist feature. Innovative tech solutions like augmented reality head-up displays (in the iX1) offer additional value to tech-savvy drivers.
In conclusion, both the BMW iX1 and Skoda Enyaq present compelling choices for anyone in the market for an electric SUV. The iX1 boasts BMW’s performance and luxury heritage, while the Enyaq prides itself on efficiency and practicality. The final decision may come down to personal preferences regarding style, brand loyalty, or which features resonate more with your driving needs. Ultimately, as the electric vehicle market continues to evolve, both of these models are set to make significant impacts.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Enyaq is marginally cheaper – starting at 41,900 £ , while the BMW iX1 costs 42,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 428 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the BMW iX1 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 14.3 kWh/100km compared to 14.8 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 0.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers moderately more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 73 km more than the BMW iX1.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers marginally more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 313 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the BMW iX1 takes 5.6 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers noticeably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 494 Nm. That’s about 185 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BMW iX1 is a bit lighter – 1,940 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 239 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers a bit more boot space – 585 L compared to 490 L. That’s a difference of about 95 L.
When it comes to payload, the BMW iX1 carries barely more – 495 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.
The Skoda Enyaq holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BMW iX1 wraps BMW's electric ambition into a compact SUV package that feels unexpectedly premium, with sharp handling and a crisp, modern cabin that keeps the driver in charge. It's ideal for buyers who want a stylish, quiet daily driver with useful practicality and tech-savvy touches — plus enough character to make the commute feel less like a chore and more like a short joyride.
details
The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42,300 - 55,200 £
|
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.3 - 15.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
466 - 514 km
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,940 - 2,085 kg
|
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
490 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,845 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
495 kg
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 313 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 494 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 230 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España