Compare performance (340 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or VW Touran?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive landscape is rapidly evolving, with electric vehicles (EVs) becoming more popular every day. Among these innovations, the Skoda Enyaq and Volkswagen Touran present two distinct approaches to modern motoring. While both vehicles offer spaciousness and practicality, they cater to different audiences and driving preferences. Here’s a detailed comparison of the Skoda Enyaq and the VW Touran.
The Skoda Enyaq is a fully electric SUV offered in multiple configurations. Engine options range from 150 to 340 horsepower, providing versatility depending on the driver's needs. With the ability to reach 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.5 seconds, the Enyaq proves itself capable in performance alongside its eco-friendly credentials. The drive type options include rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive, further enhancing its drivability.
On the other hand, the VW Touran is a multi-purpose vehicle (MPV) available with both petrol and diesel engines. The power output reaches up to 150 horsepower with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time between 8.9 seconds and 10.8 seconds, depending on the variant. The Touran primarily employs a front-wheel-drive setup, which is a standard offering in its category.
With an electric powertrain, the Skoda Enyaq boasts an impressive energy consumption rate of up to 14.6 kWh/100km, depending on the configuration. Its electric range, which varies between 432 km to an impressive 587 km, positions it as a suitable option for both urban and long-distance travel. Furthermore, it emits zero CO2, placing it in CO2 efficiency class A.
Conversely, the VW Touran's fuel efficiency varies, with consumption rates ranging from 5.1 to 6.4 L/100km. The petrol and diesel options yield CO2 emissions from 133 g/km to 147 g/km, situated in the less favorable efficiency classes D and E. While the Touran is more traditional in its fuel consumption, it still remains competitive in its segment.
The Skoda Enyaq measures 4,649 mm in length, 1,879 mm in width, and has a height of 1,621 mm, providing ample interior space while being compact enough for urban use. Its trunk capacity is a generous 585 liters, making it suitable for family trips or larger outings.
Comparatively, the VW Touran is slightly shorter at 4,527 mm but offers a larger trunk capacity of 834 liters. This additional space caters well to families and those requiring extra cargo room. The Touran's dimensions, along with its spacious five-seater configuration, make it an appealing choice for practicality.
In terms of technological advancements, the Skoda Enyaq comes equipped with cutting-edge innovations, including a sophisticated infotainment system, multiple driver assistance features, and customizable ambient lighting. Its digital cockpit integrates various functions seamlessly to enhance the driving experience and ensure connectivity on the go.
The VW Touran also includes modern technology integrations, featuring an advanced infotainment setup, various safety measures, and multiple connectivity options. However, it may not provide the same level of innovation found in the Enyaq, given its traditional powertrains.
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the VW Touran largely depends on personal preferences and driving needs. The Enyaq offers a modern electric driving experience with impressive range and efficiency, catering to environmentally conscious consumers seeking a stylish SUV. In contrast, the Touran shines in practicality, providing families with ample space and a variety of engine options. Both models excel in their respective categories, making them worthy options for any prospective buyer.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
VW Touran is only slightly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 853 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers considerably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 190 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the VW Touran takes 8.9 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 319 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW Touran is noticeably lighter – 1,520 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 554 kg.
Looking at boot space, the VW Touran offers markedly more boot space – 834 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 249 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW Touran carries somewhat more – 601 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.
The Skoda Enyaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.
details
The VW Touran is a sensible family people‑carrier that mixes practical packaging with tidy, German-built refinement, making everyday life with kids and shopping feel a lot less chaotic. If you want a reliable, no-nonsense companion that drives with surprising poise and values usefulness over flash, the Touran is a very persuasive choice.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
|
Price
36,000 - 45,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
136 - 149 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
MPV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
|
Curb weight
1,520 - 1,631 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
834 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
Width
1,829 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
449 - 526 kg
|
Payload
590 - 601 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España