Compare performance (340 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (38100 £ vs 36000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or VW Touran?
The automotive landscape is rapidly evolving, with electric vehicles (EVs) becoming more popular every day. Among these innovations, the Skoda Enyaq and Volkswagen Touran present two distinct approaches to modern motoring. While both vehicles offer spaciousness and practicality, they cater to different audiences and driving preferences. Here’s a detailed comparison of the Skoda Enyaq and the VW Touran.
The Skoda Enyaq is a fully electric SUV offered in multiple configurations. Engine options range from 150 to 340 horsepower, providing versatility depending on the driver's needs. With the ability to reach 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.5 seconds, the Enyaq proves itself capable in performance alongside its eco-friendly credentials. The drive type options include rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive, further enhancing its drivability.
On the other hand, the VW Touran is a multi-purpose vehicle (MPV) available with both petrol and diesel engines. The power output reaches up to 150 horsepower with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time between 8.9 seconds and 10.8 seconds, depending on the variant. The Touran primarily employs a front-wheel-drive setup, which is a standard offering in its category.
With an electric powertrain, the Skoda Enyaq boasts an impressive energy consumption rate of up to 14.6 kWh/100km, depending on the configuration. Its electric range, which varies between 432 km to an impressive 587 km, positions it as a suitable option for both urban and long-distance travel. Furthermore, it emits zero CO2, placing it in CO2 efficiency class A.
Conversely, the VW Touran's fuel efficiency varies, with consumption rates ranging from 5.1 to 6.4 L/100km. The petrol and diesel options yield CO2 emissions from 133 g/km to 147 g/km, situated in the less favorable efficiency classes D and E. While the Touran is more traditional in its fuel consumption, it still remains competitive in its segment.
The Skoda Enyaq measures 4,649 mm in length, 1,879 mm in width, and has a height of 1,621 mm, providing ample interior space while being compact enough for urban use. Its trunk capacity is a generous 585 liters, making it suitable for family trips or larger outings.
Comparatively, the VW Touran is slightly shorter at 4,527 mm but offers a larger trunk capacity of 834 liters. This additional space caters well to families and those requiring extra cargo room. The Touran's dimensions, along with its spacious five-seater configuration, make it an appealing choice for practicality.
In terms of technological advancements, the Skoda Enyaq comes equipped with cutting-edge innovations, including a sophisticated infotainment system, multiple driver assistance features, and customizable ambient lighting. Its digital cockpit integrates various functions seamlessly to enhance the driving experience and ensure connectivity on the go.
The VW Touran also includes modern technology integrations, featuring an advanced infotainment setup, various safety measures, and multiple connectivity options. However, it may not provide the same level of innovation found in the Enyaq, given its traditional powertrains.
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the VW Touran largely depends on personal preferences and driving needs. The Enyaq offers a modern electric driving experience with impressive range and efficiency, catering to environmentally conscious consumers seeking a stylish SUV. In contrast, the Touran shines in practicality, providing families with ample space and a variety of engine options. Both models excel in their respective categories, making them worthy options for any prospective buyer.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
VW Touran has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36000 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2062 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a convincingly edge – offering 340 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 190 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the VW Touran takes 8.90 s. That’s about 3.50 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls decisively stronger with 679 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 319 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, VW Touran is distinct lighter – 1520 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 482 kg.
In terms of boot space, the VW Touran offers evident more room – 834 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 249 L.
When it comes to payload, VW Touran a bit takes the win – 601 kg compared to 509 kg. That’s a difference of about 92 kg.
The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
The VW Touran is a sensible family people‑carrier that mixes practical packaging with tidy, German-built refinement, making everyday life with kids and shopping feel a lot less chaotic. If you want a reliable, no-nonsense companion that drives with surprising poise and values usefulness over flash, the Touran is a very persuasive choice.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
Price
36000 - 45300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
136 - 149 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
MPV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
Curb weight
1520 - 1631 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
834 L
|
|
Length
4658 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1879 mm
|
Width
1829 mm
|
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Payload
590 - 601 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
VW
|
The Skoda Enyaq is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España