Compare performance (150 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (22,300 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kamiq or Skoda Kodiaq?
As Skoda continues to consolidate its presence in the competitive SUV market, the Skoda Kamiq and Skoda Kodiaq represent two distinct options for potential buyers. Both vehicles share the Skoda badge but cater to different driving needs and lifestyles. Let’s explore their technical aspects and innovations to help you decide which model suits you best.
The Skoda Kamiq offers a compact SUV experience with dimensions of 4241 mm in length, 1793 mm in width, and 1562 mm in height. It's perfectly suited for urban settings, offering ease of maneuverability and parkability. On the other hand, the larger Skoda Kodiaq presents a more spacious experience, with a length of up to 4761 mm, a width of 1864 mm, and a height of around 1683 mm. This makes the Kodiaq ideal for families or those who require additional space for long journeys.
The Skoda Kamiq, available with a range of petrol engines, offers power outputs between 95 and 150 HP. With a front-wheel drive system and transmission options including manual and dual-clutch automatic, the Kamiq ensures a balance between efficiency and performance, achieving acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h as quickly as 8.3 seconds.
Conversely, the Kodiaq provides a broader range of powertrains, including petrol, diesel, mild hybrid, and plug-in hybrid options with power ranging from 150 to 265 HP. The Kodiaq delivers versatility with options for both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive systems, ensuring capability across various driving conditions. Notably, the plug-in hybrid offers an impressive electric range of up to 123 km and CO2 efficiency class as low as B.
Space and comfort are crucial in the SUV category. The Skoda Kamiq seats up to five passengers and has a trunk capacity of 400 liters, catering well to personal use or small families. It maintains Skoda's reputation for quality interior materials and intuitive infotainment systems.
The Kodiaq excels in providing even more room, with the ability to seat five and offering a trunk capacity of up to 910 liters. Passengers benefit from a serene cabin with superior materials and advanced tech features that enhance comfort and convenience, making long trips a pleasure.
Efficiency is a strong suit for both models. The Kamiq's petrol setup enables fuel consumption starting at 5.4 L/100 km with CO2 emissions as low as 121 g/km. Despite its larger size, the Kodiaq offers competitive efficiency, especially with its plug-in hybrid version registering a remarkable 0.4 L/100 km consumption and CO2 emissions of just 9 g/km, ideal for environmentally conscious drivers.
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and Skoda Kodiaq hinges on your lifestyle needs. The Kamiq is an excellent choice for urban dwellers who require a manageable yet stylish ride without compromising on performance. Meanwhile, the Kodiaq stands out for those pursuing space, comfort, and versatility in an SUV, while presenting an environmentally friendly option through its hybrid variants.
Both SUVs underscore Skoda’s commitment to quality, innovation, and value, ensuring that no matter your preference, the brand offers a vehicle that embodies practicality and style.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Kamiq is significantly cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,609 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 3.8 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.1 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq is only slightly faster – reaching 226 km/h, while the Skoda Kamiq tops out at 216 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers noticeably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is markedly lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 453 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more boot space – 910 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 510 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq offers markedly more capacity – up to 2,105 L, about 710 L more than the Skoda Kamiq.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries barely more – 563 kg compared to 539 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.
The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.
details
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4,241 mm
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
|
Width
1,793 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
1,562 mm
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,395 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España