Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kodiaq vs Mitsubishi Grandis comparison
Compare performance (265 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Mitsubishi Grandis?
Skoda Kodiaq vs Mitsubishi Grandis: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Kodiaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mitsubishi Grandis is considerably cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,029 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mitsubishi Grandis with 4.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.
Grandis
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers considerably more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 107 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Mitsubishi Grandis takes 9.1 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq is visibly faster – reaching 226 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Grandis tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 46 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers markedly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 135 Nm more.
Kodiaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Grandis is clearly lighter – 1,359 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 325 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers markedly more boot space – 910 L compared to 576 L. That’s a difference of about 334 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq offers markedly more capacity – up to 2,105 L, about 423 L more than the Mitsubishi Grandis.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries moderately more – 563 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 104 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £37,900
Skoda Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq
Mitsubishi Grandis
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Kodiaq
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Mitsubishi Grandis
The Mitsubishi Grandis is a no-nonsense MPV that hides a surprisingly sleek profile, making family duty look almost stylish. It’s spacious, easy to drive, and built to shrug off daily chaos, though the cabin feels dated and it prefers a relaxed cruise to any hot-hatch antics.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
Mitsubishi Grandis
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
Price
24,800 - 35,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
98 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
|
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
Length
4,413 mm
|
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
1,575 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,582 - 1,682 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
455 - 459 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
245 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
104 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,333 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.