Compare performance (265 HP vs 200 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 37,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Renault Espace?
In the realm of family SUVs, the Renault Espace and Skoda Kodiaq stand tall, each offering a unique blend of innovation, comfort, and performance. As both models undergo significant updates for the 2024 model year, we delve into a detailed comparison to help potential buyers make an informed decision.
Both the Renault Espace and Skoda Kodiaq evoke a sense of sophistication and style. The Espace measures 4722 mm in length, 1843 mm in width, and stands at a height of 1645 mm, which gives it a sleek, modern appearance. Meanwhile, the Kodiaq is slightly larger, with a length of up to 4761 mm and a width of 1864 mm, providing a more robust stance. With a height ranging from 1663 to 1683 mm, the Kodiaq also presents a commanding presence on the road.
When it comes to trunk capacity, the Kodiaq takes the lead with up to 910 liters of space compared to the Espace’s 581 liters, making it the more practical choice for families who need to haul bulkier items.
The Renault Espace offers a full hybrid engine with 200 HP, paired with an automatic gearbox for smooth driving experiences. This model achieves an impressive fuel consumption of just 4.7 L/100 km, with acceleration from 0-100 km/h clocked at 8.8 seconds. Its CO2 emissions stand at 107 g/km, placing it in a favorable C efficiency class.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq provides a broader range of powertrains, including a petrol mild-hybrid (MHEV), diesel, and a plugin hybrid option, delivering outputs ranging from 150 HP to an astonishing 265 HP. The Kodiaq's fuel consumption varies significantly depending on the engine selected, with figures from 5.3 to 8.2 L/100 km. Additionally, the Kodiaq excels in acceleration, with some variants hitting 0-100 km/h in just 6.3 seconds.
Both SUVs come equipped with cutting-edge technology designed to enhance the driving experience. The Renault Espace features a modern infotainment system with connectivity features, ensuring that passengers can stay connected on the go. The inclusion of advanced driver-assistance systems adds an extra layer of safety, making it a family-friendly choice.
Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq boasts impressive tech offerings as well, with a dual-clutch automatic transmission that enhances efficiency and performance. Its advanced infotainment setup is complemented by digital cockpit integrated displays, allowing for a fully customizable driver experience. The Kodiaq also offers a range of driver-assistance features to improve safety and convenience.
The Renault Espace supports up to 7 seats, making it an ideal choice for larger families or those who frequently travel with more passengers. The interior is designed for comfort, with ample space and cushioned seating making long trips less daunting.
Conversely, the Skoda Kodiaq comes with five seats, which may limit its appeal to larger families, although it does offer spacious seating for its class. The vehicle’s interior quality is high, with soft-touch materials and ample passenger space that rivals competitors.
Both the Renault Espace and Skoda Kodiaq offer compelling arguments for family SUV ownership. The choice ultimately boils down to personal preference: the Espace shines in hybrid efficiency, space, and flexible seating arrangements, whereas the Kodiaq dazzles with performance diversity, advanced technology, and overall practicality. Whichever you choose, both vehicles promise to deliver on comfort, style, and innovation.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Espace is marginally cheaper – starting at 37,500 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 335 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Renault Espace with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 3.4 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers markedly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 200 HP. That’s roughly 65 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Renault Espace takes 8.8 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq is clearly faster – reaching 226 km/h, while the Renault Espace tops out at 174 km/h. The difference is around 52 km/h.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Renault Espace offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Espace is marginally lighter – 1,673 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 11 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers visibly more boot space – 910 L compared to 692 L. That’s a difference of about 218 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Renault Espace offers barely more capacity – up to 2,224 L, about 119 L more than the Skoda Kodiaq.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Espace carries marginally more – 581 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 18 kg.
The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
The Renault Espace is the sort of roomy, clever family cruiser that makes long journeys feel effortless, its interior prioritising comfort and practical thinking without drifting into blandness. It won't pretend to be a sports car, but its composed ride, smart packaging and a whisper of French flair make it a sensible and subtly stylish choice for buyers who value space and versatility.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
Price
37,500 - 41,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
110 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
Curb weight
1,673 - 1,783 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 692 L
|
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
Length
4,746 mm
|
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
Width
1,830 mm
|
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
1,645 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2,054 - 2,224 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
404 - 581 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
200 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
Max Speed
174 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
147 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España