VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs Renault Scénic comparison

Compare performance (265 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 34,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Renault Scénic?

Skoda Kodiaq vs Renault Scénic: Key differences

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
  • substantially more trunk space

Renault Scénic

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • clearly more electric range

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Scénic is very slightly cheaper – starting at 34,600 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,249 £.

As for electric range, the Renault Scénic offers clearly more range – reaching up to 598 km, about 476 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Scénic

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers slightly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Renault Scénic takes 7.9 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq is noticeably faster – reaching 226 km/h, while the Renault Scénic tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 56 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers markedly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is only slightly lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 1,822 kg. The difference is around 138 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers substantially more boot space – 910 L compared to 545 L. That’s a difference of about 365 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeably more capacity – up to 2,105 L, about 435 L more than the Renault Scénic.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries only slightly more – 563 kg compared to 518 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Scénic holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,600
Scénic

Renault Scénic

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 170 - 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.6 - 17.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 420 - 598 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Skoda Kodiaq
Renault Scénic

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Scénic

The Renault Scénic is a quietly clever family MPV that balances everyday practicality with unexpected flair, offering a roomy, flexible cabin that makes school runs and weekend escapes less of a chore. It won't dazzle like a sports car, but its composed ride, sensible tech and thoughtful storage solutions make it a superbly pragmatic choice for buyers who prefer substance with a wink.

details
r161217p
r161213p
r161215p
r161242p
r161196p

Reviews Renault Scénic

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Renault Austral
Renault Scénic
VS
In the battle of the Renault Austral versus the Renault Scénic, both models showcase the brand's flair for innovation and versatility. The Austral stands out with its sleek SUV design and advanced tech features, catering to a more adventurous lifestyle. Meanwhile, the Scénic continues to impress as …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing …
Hyundai Santa Fe
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive mid-size SUV segment, the Hyundai Santa Fe and Skoda Kodiaq offer compelling options for families seeking versatility and comfort. The Hyundai Santa Fe impresses with its bold styling, advanced safety features, and an array of technology options, making it a strong contender for …
Skoda Kodiaq
Renault Scénic

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Price
34,600 - 44,000 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
420 - 598 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Curb weight
1,822 - 1,927 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
545 L
Length
4,758 mm
Length
4,470 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
Height
1,571 mm
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
Max trunk capacity
1,670 L
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
514 - 518 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
170 - 218 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
226 km/h
Max Speed
150 - 170 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
280 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
125 - 160 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kodiaq have?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.