@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs Suzuki Vitara - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (265 HP vs 129 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 23600 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Suzuki Vitara?

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Suzuki Vitara

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki Vitara has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23600 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 13277 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5 L. The difference is about 4.60 L per 100 km.

Vitara @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a clearly edge – offering 265 HP compared to 129 HP. That’s roughly 136 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Suzuki Vitara takes 9.50 s. That’s about 3.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs to a small extent better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Suzuki Vitara tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 41 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls clearly stronger with 400 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 165 Nm difference.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is noticeable lighter – 1255 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 429 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more room – 910 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 535 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs significantly better – up to 2105 L, which is about 985 L more than the Suzuki Vitara.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq clearly perceptible takes the win – 563 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 163 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Skoda Kodiaq proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Kodiaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £36,800
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.4 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 113 - 123 km
Skoda Kodiaq
Suzuki Vitara

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details

Suzuki Vitara

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.

details
Skoda Kodiaq
Suzuki Vitara
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Vitara @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption

Price
36800 - 49600 £
Price
23600 - 30900 £
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
9 - 186 g/km
co2
113 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
47 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Curb weight
1255 - 1395 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Length
4185 mm
Width
1864 mm
Width
1775 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Height
1595 mm
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Max trunk capacity
1046 - 1120 L
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
375 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
110 - 129 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5 - 12.7 s
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
81 - 95 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462 cm3

General

Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Suzuki
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.