Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kodiaq vs Suzuki Vitara comparison
Compare performance (265 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Suzuki Vitara?
Skoda Kodiaq vs Suzuki Vitara: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Kodiaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Suzuki Vitara is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,306 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 3.5 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Suzuki Vitara offers clearly more range – reaching up to 426 km, about 304 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.
Vitara
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 81 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Suzuki Vitara takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq is slightly faster – reaching 226 km/h, while the Suzuki Vitara tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 36 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers clearly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 93 Nm more.
Kodiaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is markedly lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 429 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers considerably more boot space – 910 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 535 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq offers considerably more capacity – up to 2,105 L, about 985 L more than the Suzuki Vitara.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries noticeably more – 563 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 138 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £37,900
Skoda Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq
Suzuki Vitara
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Kodiaq
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Suzuki Vitara
The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
Suzuki Vitara
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
0 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
|
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
Length
4,185 mm
|
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
1,595 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,046 - 1,120 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 12.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 - 1,462 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, A
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.