VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs Toyota Proace City Compact Van comparison

Compare performance (265 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 21200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Toyota Proace City Compact Van?

Skoda Kodiaq vs Toyota Proace City Compact Van: Key differences

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • convincingly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • significantly quicker from 0–100 km/h

Toyota Proace City Compact Van

  • decisively cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • evident lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Toyota Proace City Compact Van has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21200 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15668 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Toyota Proace City Compact Van with 5.20 L. The difference is about 3.70 L per 100 km.

As for electric range, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van performs clearly better – achieving up to 337 km, about 215 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Proace City Compact Van

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a convincingly edge – offering 265 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 129 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Toyota Proace City Compact Van takes 11.10 s. That’s about 4.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs to a small extent better – reaching 226 km/h, while the Toyota Proace City Compact Van tops out at 186 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls distinct stronger with 400 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Toyota Proace City Compact Van is evident lighter – 1358 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 326 kg.

In maximum load capacity, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van performs significantly better – up to 4300 L, which is about 2195 L more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

When it comes to payload, Toyota Proace City Compact Van noticeable takes the win – 921 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 358 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota Proace City Compact Van

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Toyota Proace City Compact Van

The Toyota Proace City Compact Van is a city-savvy workhorse that packs surprising practicality and smart packaging into a friendly, easy-to-drive package. It’s the kind of van that gets the job done without fuss — reliable, economical and just sensible enough to make fleet managers smile.

details
serpimg_VmF7qO

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Reviews Toyota Proace City Compact Van

Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota Proace City Compact Van

Costs and Consumption
Price
36800 - 50600 £
Price
21200 - 37300 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.50 kWh
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
337 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
0 - 150 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 61 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
4 - 5
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Curb weight
1358 - 1837 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4758 mm
Length
4401 - 4751 mm
Width
1864 mm
Width
1848 mm
Height
1679 - 1683 mm
Height
1860 mm
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
Max trunk capacity
3300 - 4300 L
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
560 - 921 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 13.2 s
Max Speed
205 - 226 km/h
Max Speed
135 - 186 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
1199 - 1499 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Toyota

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Enyaq is the slick, silent EV that turns everyday driving into a techy, whisper-quiet commute, while the Skoda Kodiaq remains the go-anywhere, seven-seat family SUV that swallows luggage and trailers without complaint. Choose the Enyaq for lower running costs, a modern cabin and …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing …
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.