Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
SsangYong Korando vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (190 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Korando or Ford Puma?
SsangYong Korando vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Korando
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is somewhat cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the SsangYong Korando costs 27,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,077 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the SsangYong Korando with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is visibly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 16.8 kWh/100km for the SsangYong Korando. That’s a difference of about 3.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers a bit more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 78 km more than the SsangYong Korando.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the SsangYong Korando offers moderately more power – delivering 190 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 22 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the SsangYong Korando takes 8.4 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the SsangYong Korando delivers moderately more torque with 360 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Korando
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is moderately lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,517 kg. The difference is around 201 kg.
Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Korando offers only slightly more boot space – 551 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries barely more – 469 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
SsangYong Korando
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
SsangYong Korando
The SsangYong Korando pairs bold, modern styling with a surprisingly roomy and practical cabin, so it looks confident at the lights and handles the daily grind without fuss. It swaps flashy badges for honest value, offering a composed ride, useful equipment and wallet-friendly running that make it an appealing pick for buyers who'd rather spend on weekends than on extravagant finance packages.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
SsangYong Korando
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,000 - 42,000 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
339 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 197 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,517 - 1,840 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
551 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
4,450 - 4,465 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,870 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
1,620 - 1,645 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,248 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
410 - 463 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 190 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
156 - 191 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 360 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
120 - 140 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
SsangYong
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.