Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Kia Stonic - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 115 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 20100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Kia Stonic?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Kia Stonic has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20100 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4637 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.60 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.
Stonic
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a distinct edge – offering 168 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 53 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.70 s. That’s about 3.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Kia Stonic tops out at 182 km/h. The difference is around 28 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls noticeable stronger with 290 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Kia Stonic is slight lighter – 1205 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 111 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly perceptible more room – 523 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 171 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs barely noticeable better – up to 1283 L, which is about 128 L more than the Kia Stonic.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma hardly perceptible takes the win – 469 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Kia Stonic
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Kia Stonic
The Kia Stonic is a sprightly compact crossover that mixes city-friendly agility with a cheeky, modern design — perfect for buyers who want style without sacrificing sense. Inside it serves up clever practicality and a bright, well-equipped cabin, making everyday driving feel a bit more fun than it has any right to be.
details
Ford Puma
Kia Stonic
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
20100 - 26600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
127 - 133 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1205 - 1270 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
352 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4165 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1760 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1520 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1155 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
440 - 445 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
179 - 182 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Kia
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.