Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Kia Stonic?
In the bustling world of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Kia Stonic shine as two notable contenders. Both vehicles offer an attractive blend of technology, efficiency, and style, positioning themselves as strong players in this competitive segment. Let's delve into their technical aspects and innovations to help you make an informed choice.
The Ford Puma stands out with its diverse engine options, including Petrol MHEV and Electric variants. The Puma's power ranges from 125 to 160 HP for petrol engines and reaches up to 168 HP on the electric model. Its acceleration time from 0-100 km/h varies between a swift 8 to 9.8 seconds depending on the version, promising a dynamic driving experience. Additionally, the Puma offers a top speed of up to 210 km/h.
On the other hand, the Kia Stonic is primarily powered by Petrol and Petrol MHEV engines, offering between 79 and 100 HP. Although not as powerful as the Puma, the Stonic delivers reliable performance with an acceleration between 11.3 to 14.2 seconds from 0-100 km/h. The Stonic reaches a maximum speed of 179 km/h, ensuring a steady drive suitable for urban commuting.
Both models offer manual and automatic transmission options. The Ford Puma includes a manual gearbox, dual-clutch automatic, and reduction gearbox, catering to a wide range of driving preferences. Similarly, the Kia Stonic comes with a manual gearbox and a dual-clutch automatic, highlighting flexibility for drivers seeking a more hands-on approach or a seamless automatic experience.
The fuel consumption for the Ford Puma varies between 5.4 to 6 L/100 km for the petrol variants and an efficient 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100 km for the electric option, boasting an impressive electric range of up to 376 km. With CO2 emissions ranging from 0 to 136 g/km, the Puma shows versatility in its eco-friendly aspirations.
Comparatively, the Kia Stonic displays a fuel consumption rate between 5.5 to 5.8 L/100 km, with CO2 emissions locked between 125 to 132 g/km. While its eco credentials are slightly less impressive than the Puma's, the Stonic maintains a respectable rating within its class.
The Ford Puma presents a sturdy SUV profile with dimensions of 4186 to 4226 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and a height of 1550 to 1555 mm. It offers ample trunk capacity ranging from 456 to 523 liters, making it a practical choice for storage and everyday use.
The Kia Stonic, while slightly more compact, measures 4140 mm in length, 1760 mm in width, and 1505 mm in height. It offers a trunk capacity of 352 liters, providing adequate space for small families or urban adventures.
Choosing between the Ford Puma and Kia Stonic depends heavily on individual preferences and needs. The Puma is favored for its powerful performance, innovative hybrid technology, and flexibility. Meanwhile, the Stonic shines with its practicality and reliable efficiency, offering an appealing package for those who prioritize a straightforward, efficient urban vehicle. Ultimately, both SUVs represent the exemplary shift towards modern, compact automotive solutions, catering to diverse lifestyles and driving desires.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Kia Stonic has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20100 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 4637 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.60 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a distinct edge – offering 168 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 53 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.70 s. That’s about 3.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Kia Stonic tops out at 182 km/h. The difference is around 28 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls noticeable stronger with 290 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Kia Stonic is slight lighter – 1205 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 111 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly perceptible more room – 523 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 171 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs barely noticeable better – up to 1283 L, which is about 128 L more than the Kia Stonic.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma hardly perceptible takes the win – 469 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.
The Ford Puma proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
The Kia Stonic is a sprightly compact crossover that mixes city-friendly agility with a cheeky, modern design — perfect for buyers who want style without sacrificing sense. Inside it serves up clever practicality and a bright, well-equipped cabin, making everyday driving feel a bit more fun than it has any right to be.
details
@ Kia Corporation
@ Kia Corporation
@ Kia Corporation
@ Kia Corporation
@ Kia Corporation
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Kia Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
20100 - 26600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
127 - 133 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1205 - 1270 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
352 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4165 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1760 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1520 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1155 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
440 - 445 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
179 - 182 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Kia
|
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España