VS

Suzuki Swace vs Omoda 5 comparison

Compare performance (140 HP vs 224 HP), boot space and price (31,900 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Swace or Omoda 5?

Suzuki Swace vs Omoda 5: Key differences

Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Swace

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Omoda 5 is clearly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Suzuki Swace costs 31,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,106 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swace uses 4.5 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Omoda 5 with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 offers visibly more power – delivering 224 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 84 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

Swace

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swace is only slightly lighter – 1,475 kg compared to 1,621 kg. The difference is around 146 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Swace offers clearly more boot space – 596 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 246 L.

When it comes to payload, the Omoda 5 carries noticeably more – 536 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 176 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 5 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,800
5

Omoda 5

  • Engine Type Electric, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 224 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 430 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Suzuki Swace
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Frequently compared as well

Omoda 5
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Omoda 5 brings bold, modern styling and a tech-forward package, while the Toyota C‑HR emphasizes distinctive design, proven reliability and a refined hybrid powertrain. This comparison covers practicality, driving character, equipment and running costs to help you decide which compact crossover …
Hyundai Tucson
Omoda 5
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and the Omoda 5 are two compact SUVs that appeal to buyers seeking practicality with distinct personalities — Tucson for proven dependability, Omoda 5 for sharp styling and tech-focused features. This comparison will pinpoint how they differ in space, equipment, driving feel and …
Omoda 5
Renault Symbioz
VS
This comparison pits the Omoda 5 against the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which car fits your needs. We'll cover design, practicality, driving experience, technology and running costs so you can tell whether the pragmatic, value-oriented Omoda 5 or the more futuristic Renault Symbioz aligns …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Dacia Duster
Omoda 5
VS
The Dacia Duster and Omoda 5 are compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Duster prioritizes rugged practicality, simplicity and low running costs, while the Omoda 5 leans on bold styling, tech-rich cabins and a more refined on-road feel. This quick comparison will help you decide whether …
Nissan Qashqai
Omoda 5
VS
In the compact-crossover ring the Nissan Qashqai plays the reliable all‑rounder — comfortable ride, polished interior and a strong dealer network that makes it an easy, practical buy for families. The Omoda 5 is the flashy newcomer: dramatic design, generous tech kit and excellent value, but you …
Kia Sportage
Omoda 5
VS
The Kia Sportage and the Omoda 5 go head-to-head in the compact SUV class, offering very different takes on style, technology and everyday practicality. This comparison will help you choose between the Sportage's proven comfort, refinement and broad dealer support and the Omoda 5's striking design, …
Omoda 5
Peugeot 2008
VS
The Omoda 5 and the Peugeot 2008 are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want stylish urban SUVs with modern tech—Omoda 5 focuses on bold design and strong equipment-for-the-price, while the 2008 leans on European refinement and sharper handling. This comparison will help you decide whether you …
Suzuki Swace
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
Price
31,900 £
Price
24,800 - 31,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
430 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
102 g/km
co2
0 - 120 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Curb weight
1,621 - 1,710 kg
Trunk capacity
596 L
Trunk capacity
300 - 350 L
Length
4,655 mm
Length
-
Width
1,790 mm
Width
1,824 - 1,830 mm
Height
1,460 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
360 kg
Payload
431 - 536 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 HP
Power HP
204 - 224 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
295 - 340 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 kW
Power kW
150 - 165 kW
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
Omoda
Is the Suzuki Swace offered with different drivetrains?

The Suzuki Swace is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.