Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Suzuki Vitara vs Toyota Proace City Compact Van comparison
Compare performance (184 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 22,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Vitara or Toyota Proace City Compact Van?
Suzuki Vitara vs Toyota Proace City Compact Van: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Vitara
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Toyota Proace City Compact Van is only slightly cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the Suzuki Vitara costs 23,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,218 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Proace City Compact Van uses 5.2 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Suzuki Vitara is visibly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 18.5 kWh/100km for the Toyota Proace City Compact Van. That’s a difference of about 3.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Suzuki Vitara offers markedly more range – reaching up to 426 km, about 89 km more than the Toyota Proace City Compact Van.
Proace City Compact Van
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara offers clearly more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Toyota Proace City Compact Van takes 11.1 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Vitara delivers marginally more torque with 307 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 7 Nm more.
Vitara
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is very slightly lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,358 kg. The difference is around 103 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van carries significantly more – 921 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 496 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Suzuki Vitara is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,600
Suzuki Vitara
Suzuki Vitara
Toyota Proace City Compact Van
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Suzuki Vitara
The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.
details
Toyota Proace City Compact Van
The Toyota Proace City Compact Van is a city-savvy workhorse that packs surprising practicality and smart packaging into a friendly, easy-to-drive package. It’s the kind of van that gets the job done without fuss — reliable, economical and just sensible enough to make fleet managers smile.
details
Suzuki Vitara
Toyota Proace City Compact Van
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
Price
22,400 - 37,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
Electric Range
337 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 137 g/km
|
co2
0 - 149 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
Curb weight
1,358 - 1,837 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Payload
560 - 921 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 13.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
Toyota
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.