VS

Volvo EX40 vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (442 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX40 or Mazda CX-6e?

Volvo EX40 vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

Volvo EX40

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • somewhat more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter

Mazda CX-6e

  • slightly more trunk space

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EX40

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Both models are evenly matched in price – each starts at 42,800 £ .

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX40 is moderately more efficient: consuming 16.6 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 2.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX40 offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 576 km, about 92 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX40 offers significantly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 184 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX40 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX40 delivers considerably more torque with 670 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 380 Nm more.

EX40

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo EX40 is very slightly lighter – 2,040 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 165 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-6e offers slightly more boot space – 468 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 58 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX40 carries somewhat more – 480 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 95 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX40 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,800
EX40

Volvo EX40

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 480 - 576 km
Volvo EX40
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Volvo EX40

The Volvo EX40 wraps Scandinavian calm and clever practicality into a compact electric package that feels both premium and refreshingly uncomplicated. It's the grown-up answer to flashier rivals — a safe, comfy, and city-friendly EV with thoughtful tech that makes everyday driving quietly satisfying.

details

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
Volvo EX40
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption

Price
42,800 - 58,200 £
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
480 - 576 km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,170 kg
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Trunk capacity
410 L
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
4,440 mm
Length
-
Width
1,863 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Height
1,647 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,400 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
430 - 480 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.