Compare performance (442 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX40 or Toyota Urban Cruiser?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Toyota Urban Cruiser is significantly cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Volvo EX40 costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,143 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota Urban Cruiser is a bit more efficient: consuming 15 kWh/100km compared to 16.6 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX40. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo EX40 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 576 km, about 150 km more than the Toyota Urban Cruiser.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX40 offers substantially more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 258 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX40 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Toyota Urban Cruiser takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Volvo EX40 is moderately faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Toyota Urban Cruiser tops out at 150 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX40 delivers considerably more torque with 670 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 363 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota Urban Cruiser is somewhat lighter – 1,775 kg compared to 2,040 kg. The difference is around 265 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Volvo EX40 offers clearly more boot space – 410 L compared to 310 L. That’s a difference of about 100 L.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX40 carries a bit more – 480 kg compared to 421 kg. That’s a difference of about 59 kg.
The Volvo EX40 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Volvo EX40 wraps Scandinavian calm and clever practicality into a compact electric package that feels both premium and refreshingly uncomplicated. It's the grown-up answer to flashier rivals — a safe, comfy, and city-friendly EV with thoughtful tech that makes everyday driving quietly satisfying.
detailsThe Toyota Urban Cruiser is a compact SUV that offers a blend of style and practicality, making it well-suited for urban living. It captures attention with its bold design, while providing a high driving position that enhances visibility and control on city roads. Inside, the Urban Cruiser offers comfortable seating and a range of features that cater to both driver and passengers, emphasizing convenience and everyday usability.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42,800 - 58,200 £
|
Price
25,700 - 38,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
480 - 576 km
|
Electric Range
330 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,170 kg
|
Curb weight
1,775 - 1,939 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
410 L
|
Trunk capacity
306 - 310 L
|
|
Length
4,440 mm
|
Length
4,285 mm
|
|
Width
1,863 mm
|
Width
1,800 mm
|
|
Height
1,647 mm
|
Height
1,635 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,400 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
430 - 480 kg
|
Payload
411 - 421 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
Power HP
144 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
150 km/h
|
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
Power kW
106 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Toyota
|