VS

VW ID.3 vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (231 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW ID.3 or Mazda CX-30?

VW ID.3 vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

VW ID.3

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ID.3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the VW ID.3 costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,433 £.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the VW ID.3 offers moderately more power – delivering 231 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 45 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW ID.3 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.1 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW ID.3 delivers clearly more torque with 350 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.

ID.3

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is noticeably lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,885 kg. The difference is around 430 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers somewhat more boot space – 430 L compared to 383 L. That’s a difference of about 47 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries barely more – 496 kg compared to 464 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW ID.3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,100
ID.3

VW ID.3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 170 - 231 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.9 - 14.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 410 - 629 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
VW ID.3
VS
Choosing between the retro-inspired Renault 5 and the practical VW ID.3 comes down to whether you value character and compact city agility or proven electric range and grown-up practicality. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each car shines and which one fits different kinds …
VW ID.3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the VW ID.3 and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a nimble, hatchback-style EV focused on urban driving or a slightly more spacious, crossover-style model prioritizing practicality. This comparison looks at range, interior space, driving feel and overall value to help …
VW ID.3
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

VW ID.3

The VW ID.3 is Volkswagen’s compact electric hatch that prioritizes practical daily usability with a comfortable, modern interior. It delivers a smooth, quiet driving experience and intuitive tech that makes switching to electric straightforward.

details
DB2020AU01067_medium
DB2019AU01515_medium
DB2019AU01516_medium
DB2020AU01118_medium
DB2020AU01119_medium
DB2020AU01097_medium
DB2020AU01100_medium

Reviews VW ID.3

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Pennings
6 May 2026, 08:03:27

ID.3 catches less wind. It's more pleasant, especially on the highway. Also: more economical, lighter and with the same step‑in height.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mr C Blagdon
14 Jan 2026, 12:07:54

Great all rounder, surprisingly spacious cabin. Rapid and refined. Not quiet enough space in the boot for a bike, could use more ground clearance.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

VW ID.3
VW ID.4
VS
Choosing between the VW ID.3 and the VW ID.4 means deciding between a compact hatchback-style electric built for city driving and a roomier compact SUV that prioritizes cargo space and versatility. I’ll compare range, practicality, driving feel and running costs so you can see which one suits your …
VW ID.3
VW ID.Polo
VS
Choosing between the Volkswagen ID.3 and the VW ID. Polo comes down to whether you want a compact electric hatch with more range and interior space (ID.3) or a smaller, city-focused EV that prioritizes maneuverability and lower running costs (ID. Polo). Below I'll compare their range, practicality, …
Volvo EX30
VW ID.3
VS
The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact, sharply tuned EV with Scandinavian flair — sprightly, surprisingly premium and built to put a grin on urban commutes. The VW ID.3, by contrast, plays the sensible family card with more interior space, comfort and range options, so pick the EX30 for driving fun …
Kia EV3
VW ID.3
VS
Pitted against each other, the Kia EV3 feels like the roomy, no-nonsense upstart — taller, more practical and geared toward families who want SUV style without the fuel bill — while the VW ID.3 is the sharper, more polished hatch that rewards drivers who prefer nimble handling and mature software. …
MINI Aceman
VW ID.3
VS
The MINI Aceman and the Volkswagen ID.3 offer two distinct takes on the compact electric car: the Aceman leans on MINI’s character and driver-focused feel, while the ID.3 emphasizes efficiency, roomy interior and everyday practicality. This comparison will cut through the specs to show where they …
VW ID.3
Skoda Epiq
VS
Comparing the ID.3 and the Epiq pits two compact electric hatchbacks against each other: both suit city drivers and small families but prioritise different strengths. The ID.3 leans toward a refined, tech-focused driving experience, while the Epiq emphasises practical space, clever packaging and …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
VW ID.3
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
29,100 - 40,800 £
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.9 - 14.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
410 - 629 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,885 - 1,966 kg
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity
383 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,809 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
422 - 464 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 - 231 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 - 8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
125 - 170 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
VW
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the VW ID.3 have?

The VW ID.3 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.