VS

VW T-Cross vs Porsche Cayman comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 500 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 136,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Cross or Porsche Cayman?

VW T-Cross vs Porsche Cayman: Key differences

VW T-Cross

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • somewhat lighter
  • substantially more trunk space

Porsche Cayman

  • considerably more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Cross

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW T-Cross is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Porsche Cayman costs 136,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 114,634 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW T-Cross uses 5.4 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Porsche Cayman with 13 L/100km. The difference is about 7.6 L/100km.

Cayman

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Porsche Cayman offers considerably more power – delivering 500 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 350 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Porsche Cayman is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.4 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.4 s. That’s about 5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Porsche Cayman delivers significantly more torque with 450 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm more.

T-Cross

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: VW T-Cross offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Cross is somewhat lighter – 1,267 kg compared to 1,490 kg. The difference is around 223 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW T-Cross offers substantially more boot space – 455 L compared to 184 L. That’s a difference of about 271 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Cross carries clearly more – 480 kg compared to 281 kg. That’s a difference of about 199 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW T-Cross is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
T-Cross

VW T-Cross

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
The SEAT Arona and VW T‑Cross duke it out in the small SUV ring: the Arona brings punchy styling and a driver-focused feel, while the T‑Cross leans on roomy practicality and Volkswagen calm. Pick the Arona for a bit more sparkle and sporty character, or the T‑Cross if cargo space, refinement and …
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
VW T-Cross
Porsche Cayman

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

VW T-Cross

The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews VW T-Cross

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Monika
12 Feb 2026, 07:34:19

I chose the T‑Cross — more comfortable and roomier inside, especially for adult passengers; bought on the model‑year clearance — running costs work out cheaper even taking into account fuel savings from the Toyota hybrid (planned over five years); I like the space and the VW suited me better — I prefer the view through the front windshield.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Erasmo Paone
21 Oct 2025, 21:49:59

Very practical, interior space is excellent. Lacks charm, fuel consumption is a bit high.

Porsche Cayman

The Porsche Cayman stands out as a quintessential sports car, blending sleek design with dynamic handling. Its mid-engine layout provides an excellent balance and sharp agility that driving enthusiasts crave. Inside, the Cayman offers a refined and driver-focused interior, ensuring that every journey is an exhilarating experience.

details
serpimg_F8cdKb

Reviews Porsche Cayman

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact crossover showdown, the Renault Captur dazzles with bold styling, quirky customization and clever interior tricks, while the VW T-Cross takes a quieter route—solid build, practical space and no-nonsense usability. Choose the Captur if you want personality and fun; pick the T‑Cross if …
VW T-Cross
VW Taigo
VS
Meet the VW T‑Cross and VW Taigo: two compact crossovers from Volkswagen chasing the same urban buyers but with very different personalities — the practical, upright T‑Cross versus the swoopy, style-first Taigo. Read on to see which one earns a place in your driveway, whether you prize family …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
The Ford Puma and VW T‑Cross go head-to-head in the compact crossover class — one flirty and fun, the other sensible and steady — both promising SUV looks without the bulk. We’ll pit the Puma’s lively handling and clever storage tricks against the T‑Cross’s comfort-first setup and family-friendly …
Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
The Toyota Yaris Cross sails ahead with brilliant hybrid economy, city-sized agility and Toyota’s trademark reliability, while the VW T‑Cross scores for sensible packaging, a bigger boot and a more grown-up driving feel. If you live in town and worship low fuel bills pick the Yaris Cross; if you …
Hyundai Kona
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive world of subcompact SUVs, the Hyundai Kona and VW T-Cross present a compelling showdown. The Hyundai Kona is celebrated for its bold design and sporty performance, while the VW T-Cross offers a more reserved elegance coupled with practical German engineering. Buyers seeking a …
VW T-Cross
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the VW T-Cross and VW T-Roc showcase distinct personalities, catering to different preferences. The T-Cross excels in urban agility and practical, family-friendly features, while the T-Roc leans towards a sportier design and a more engaging driving experience. Both …
Audi Q2
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Audi Q2 and VW T-Cross offer distinct personalities, catering to varying consumer preferences. The Q2 boasts a more premium feel with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, while the T-Cross provides practicality with its spacious cabin and impressive …
Suzuki Vitara
VW T-Cross
VS
In this showdown between the Suzuki Vitara and VW T-Cross, both compact SUVs offer distinct advantages for urban and adventurous drivers alike. The Vitara impresses with its robust off-road capabilities and generous interior space, while the T-Cross shines with its stylish design and advanced tech …
VW T-Cross
Porsche Cayman

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
Price
136,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
13 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
124 - 136 g/km
co2
295 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Coupe
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
2
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
Curb weight
1,490 kg
Trunk capacity
455 L
Trunk capacity
184 L
Length
-
Length
4,456 mm
Width
1,784 mm
Width
1,822 mm
Height
-
Height
1,267 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
272 L
Payload
463 - 480 kg
Payload
281 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Power HP
500 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
315 km/h
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Torque
450 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
6
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Power kW
368 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
3,996 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,021
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
VW
Brand
Porsche
What drivetrain options does the VW T-Cross have?

The VW T-Cross is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.