Compare performance (150 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (26,400 £ vs 22,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Roc or Jeep Avenger?
The compact SUV segment has been continuously growing, and two noteworthy contenders for potential buyers are the Jeep Avenger and the VW T-Roc. Both vehicles promise style, versatility, and the performance expected from their respective brands. In this comparison, we will delve into their technical specifications, innovations, and what they bring to the table.
The Jeep Avenger offers a range of powertrains, including electric and petrol options. It provides three engine variants, with the electric version boasting 156 horsepower, paired with a 51 kWh battery that offers up to 400 km of range. The Avenger performs impressively, accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in just 9 seconds.
In comparison, the VW T-Roc provides a broader spectrum of choices, ranging from efficient petrol and diesel engines. Its engine lineup includes options delivering between 115 to 300 horsepower, ensuring a performance-oriented option for a variety of driving styles. The T-Roc’s performance is highlighted by its top-of-the-line variant, which can achieve 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds.
When considering fuel efficiency, the Jeep Avenger leads in the electric segment with a consumption rate of 15.4 kWh/100 km, making it a great option for eco-conscious buyers. Its petrol variant, however, offers a reasonable consumption of 5.7 L/100 km.
The T-Roc showcases impressive fuel consumption figures as well, with its most efficient diesel engine consuming as low as 4.7 L/100 km. The petrol options range from 5.6 to 7.3 L/100 km, which is competitive within the segment.
Both the Jeep Avenger and VW T-Roc are designed with passenger comfort in mind. The Avenger offers a spacious interior, accommodating up to 5 passengers with a trunk capacity of 355 liters. However, the T-Roc shines with its trunk capacity ranging from 392 to 445 liters, providing additional utility for luggage and gear.
The T-Roc also provides a range of upscale options for interior materials and technology, creating an inviting atmosphere for both driver and passengers. The Avenger’s interior focuses on practicality and rugged design, which is characteristic of the Jeep brand.
Safety is paramount in both models. The Jeep Avenger is equipped with multiple advanced driver-assistance systems, including lane departure warning, adaptive cruise control, and automated emergency braking, which enhance overall safety and driving convenience.
The T-Roc stands out with its advanced infotainment system integrated with modern connectivity features. Its digital cockpit provides real-time driving data and media control, elevating the driving experience further.
In terms of driving dynamics, the Jeep Avenger, being a front-wheel-drive SUV, is crafted for a smooth and comfortable ride, ideal for urban driving and light off-road adventures. Its compact dimensions also contribute to its agility in navigating through city streets.
The VW T-Roc, available in both front and all-wheel drive, offers a sportier driving experience with an emphasis on handling and stability. Its precise steering and suspension setup allow for confident cornering and highway cruising.
Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and VW T-Roc ultimately comes down to personal preference and intended use. If eco-friendliness and electric performance are priorities, the Avenger is an excellent choice. Conversely, if performance versatility, trunk space, and advanced technology are more critical, the T-Roc emerges as a stronger contender.
Both vehicles are impressive in their own right, offering unique advantages that cater to different segments of the market. Whether you seek an electric adventure or a sporty everyday SUV, either model promises a compelling driving experience.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Jeep Avenger is a bit cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,896 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Avenger uses 4.9 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Avenger offers only slightly more power – delivering 156 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 6 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Roc is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Avenger delivers only slightly more torque with 260 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is markedly lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 285 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Jeep Avenger offers clearly more boot space – 380 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 96 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries very slightly more – 515 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 13 kg.
The Jeep Avenger is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.
detailsThe Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
|
Price
22,500 - 36,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
|
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
284 L
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,084 - 4,088 mm
|
|
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
|
Width
1,776 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,527 - 1,541 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,218 - 1,277 L
|
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
Jeep
|