VS

VW T-Roc vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (26,400 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Roc or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

VW T-Roc vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences

VW T-Roc

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • markedly lighter

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Roc

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Roc is considerably cheaper – starting at 26,400 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,847 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses 3.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.8 L/100km.

Range Rover Evoque

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers substantially more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 119 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers substantially more torque with 540 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 290 Nm more.

T-Roc

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Roc is markedly lighter – 1,465 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 327 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers clearly more boot space – 472 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 188 L.

When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries slightly more – 600 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,300
Range Rover Evoque

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 160 - 269 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …
VW T-Roc
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

VW T-Roc

The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.

details
RR_EVQ_20MY_Dynamic_ND_221118_02_big
067rrevq20mysilverdynamic045
Range Rover Evoque Plug-In Hybrid_MJ20jpg (15)
RR_EVQ_21MY_INTERIOR_260820_S44_03

Reviews Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca is the sensible, roomy sibling that prioritises practicality and comfort, while the VW T‑Roc plays the cooler, more characterful role with sharper styling and a slightly cheekier drive — both share the VW Group's solid underpinnings and similar engines. Choose the Ateca if you need …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
Skoda Karoq
VW T-Roc
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible family hero — roomy boot, comfortable seats and clever practicality — while the VW T‑Roc swaps some of that pragmatism for sharper styling and a livelier, more involving drive. Choose the Karoq for space and value, the T‑Roc if you want personality and a bit more fun …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
Opel Mokka
VW T-Roc
VS
In the ongoing rivalry between Opel and Volkswagen, the Astra and Golf stand out as two of the most popular compact cars in Europe. While the Astra offers a rewarding driving experience and impressive technology at a competitive price, the Golf remains a benchmark for quality, versatility, and …
VW T-Roc
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 143 g/km
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
Trunk capacity
284 L
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Width
1,900 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 515 kg
Payload
503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
Brand
VW
Brand
Land Rover
What drive types are available for the VW T-Roc?

The VW T-Roc is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.