VS

VW T-Roc vs Lynk & Co 01 comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 280 HP), boot space and price (26,400 £ vs 36,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Roc or Lynk & Co 01?

VW T-Roc vs Lynk & Co 01: Key differences

VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • visibly lighter
details

Lynk & Co 01

4.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

T-Roc

Exploring the Contenders: VW T-Roc vs. Lynk & Co 01

In the ever-growing world of compact SUVs, the VW T-Roc and the Lynk & Co 01 stand out as compelling choices for contemporary drivers. Both models offer a blend of style, technology, and performance, putting them high on the list for those seeking versatility and modern innovation. Let's delve into a detailed comparison of these two automotive contenders, examining their technical features, innovations, and what makes each unique.

01

Power and Performance

The VW T-Roc, a popular choice among petrol and diesel enthusiasts, offers a range of engine options. With power outputs ranging from 115 HP to 300 HP, and torque between 200 Nm and 400 Nm, the T-Roc promises a responsive drive suitable for urban commutes and highway cruising alike. The top-of-the-line model accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in an impressive 4.9 seconds, reaching a maximum speed of 250 km/h.

In contrast, the Lynk & Co 01 focuses on sustainability with its plug-in hybrid technology, delivering power outputs of up to 276 HP and torque reaching 535 Nm. The 01 propels from 0 to 100 km/h as swiftly as 7.7 seconds, with a maximum speed of 210 km/h. Its electric range of 75 km and fuel consumption of just 0.9 L/100km make it an alluring choice for eco-conscious drivers.

T-Roc

Dimensions and Design

Both SUVs boast robust designs, but differ in their dimensions and aesthetics. The T-Roc, measuring between 4236 mm to 4271 mm in length, 1811 mm in width, and up to 1584 mm in height, presents a compact yet muscular posture, embodying VW's signature style and practicality. It offers a trunk capacity of up to 445 liters, making it a practical choice for everyday needs.

The Lynk & Co 01 stretches to approximately 4545 mm in length with a slightly broader stance of 1860 mm in width and a towering height of 1694 mm, giving it a more commanding road presence. It provides a larger trunk capacity of 466 liters, ideal for those with a penchant for road trips and outdoor adventures.

01

Innovation and Technology

Both vehicles are equipped with modern transmission systems. The T-Roc offers both manual and dual-clutch automatic gearboxes, providing flexibility depending on driving preference. Meanwhile, the 01 employs a seamless automatic transmission that pairs well with its hybrid powertrain.

Innovative features are plentiful in both models. The VW T-Roc is equipped with advanced driver-assistance systems and connectivity options that emphasize safety and infotainment. On the other hand, the Lynk & Co 01 emphasizes a connected driving experience with its focus on shared usage and app-based accessibility, appealing to tech-savvy consumers.

T-Roc

Eco-Friendliness and Efficiency

When it comes to environmental impact, the Lynk & Co 01 takes a clear lead, boasting CO2 emissions as low as 20 g/km, thanks in large part to its hybrid engine. Its efficiency is underscored by the B-class CO2 efficiency rating. In comparison, the T-Roc's CO2 emissions range from 128 to 194 g/km, reflecting a more traditional engine setup.

01

Final Thoughts

The VW T-Roc and Lynk & Co 01 each bring unique propositions to the SUV segment. The T-Roc dazzles with its varied engine options, robust performance metrics, and quintessentially German engineering. The Lynk & Co 01, however, appeals to those prioritizing environmental impact and the latest in connectivity and shared mobility concepts.

Ultimately, the choice between the two will hinge on the driver's priorities: the thrill of traditional power versus the allure of sustainable innovation. Both vehicles, however, testify to the dynamic innovations shaping today’s automotive landscape.

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Roc is about choosing whether you prefer a classic, driver-focused hatchback or a compact SUV with higher ride height and added practicality. The Golf delivers sharper handling and refined efficiency, while the T‑Roc brings more interior space and a more …
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a bolder, slightly sportier compact SUV. Both share similar underpinnings, but the Kamiq excels in interior space and efficiency while the T‑Roc offers sharper styling and a …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Roc

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW T-Roc is visibly cheaper – starting at 26,400 £ , while the Lynk & Co 01 costs 36,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,414 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Lynk & Co 01 uses 0.9 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 4.6 L/100km.

01

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 01 offers significantly more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 130 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 01 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 7.7 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Lynk & Co 01 delivers clearly more torque with 535 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 285 Nm more.

T-Roc

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Roc is visibly lighter – 1,465 kg compared to 1,935 kg. The difference is around 470 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Lynk & Co 01 offers visibly more boot space – 466 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 182 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries moderately more – 515 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 100 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 01 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,900
01

Lynk & Co 01

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 280 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 75 km
details
VW T-Roc
Lynk & Co 01

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

VW T-Roc

The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Lynk & Co 01

The Lynk & Co 01 marries bold, contemporary styling with a roomy, well-appointed cabin, striking a rare balance between fashionable flair and everyday practicality. With intuitive tech, flexible ownership ideas and a playful driving character, it’s the kind of crossover that turns heads at the lights and keeps owners grinning on the commute.

details
381453-front_side_view-936758-original-1615303870
381443-side_view-fe0530-original-1615303770
381451-front_interior-54cae9-original-1615303868

Reviews Lynk & Co 01

4.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
Vermeeren
9 May 2026, 12:57:59

Looks tough, has all the options. Good electric range. My wife drives to and from work every day. Because of that we only have to refuel once every 1–2 months. Drives wonderfully. Great sound system. A pleasure to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Lee Burkitt
15 Mar 2026, 04:44:31

I have the 01 from 2022 and have had it for 2 years. It's been a lovely car to own and drive. I return from Spain to the UK twice a year in it and it's a pleasure to travel in. The only grip has been the infotainment system which has been buggy and slow. I had the software updated a few weeks ago at the Volvo garage as the over the air option does not work. This has made the infotainment system acceptable now.

It takes a while to get used to the seats for me as the base is quite hard but now I feel they are very confortable. I charge it everyday in the carpark and I use it 90% of the time on electric mode. It does the 70km on a full charge as stated and in petrol mode I'm getting around 16km a litre or 75 a gallon, the engine is only used on motorways.

Aftersales service is patchy here in Spain. My nearest dealer is about a 40 min drive from here, it's not like owning a Renault where there's a dealer everywhere, I've only had to take it there twice, once turned out to be a stone in a brake caliper causing a squeak and the other for the software update.

I highly recommend these cars!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
The verstegen
6 Jan 2026, 09:56:38

Top car.
Quality and price.
Great caravan tow vehicle.
A shame there's so much driving.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca and the VW T‑Roc are two closely related compact crossover SUVs from the Volkswagen Group, each offering a blend of practicality, comfort and engaging driving manners. This comparison will highlight where the Ateca’s straightforward value and roomy practicality differ from the …
Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
CUPRA Formentor
VW T-Roc
VS
The Cupra Formentor and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that balance everyday practicality with distinct personalities—one leaning sporty and style‑focused, the other aiming for broad appeal and comfort. This quick comparison highlights how the Formentor’s sharper driving character and design …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you value Audi’s upmarket feel and refinement or the T‑Roc’s sharper pricing and practical versatility. This comparison focuses on real-world driving, interior quality, technology and running costs to help you decide which compact …
Audi Q2
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q2 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossover SUVs aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions with a touch of style and practicality. This comparison focuses on driving feel, interior space, technology and ownership costs to help you decide which suits your priorities.
VW T-Roc
Lynk & Co 01

Costs and Consumption
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Price
36,900 - 40,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
75 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 143 g/km
co2
20 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Curb weight
1,935 kg
Trunk capacity
284 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 515 kg
Payload
415 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Power HP
280 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Torque
535 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Power kW
206 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
VW
Brand
Lynk & Co
What drive types are available for the VW T-Roc?

The VW T-Roc is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.