Compare performance (150 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (26,400 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Roc or Mazda CX-30?
The compact SUV market has exploded in recent years, offering customers an attractive combination of style, performance, and utility. In this segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Volkswagen T-Roc stand out as two prominent contenders. Both vehicles deliver a compelling package; however, they come with their distinct personalities and technical specifications.
The Mazda CX-30 is equipped with a robust petrol MHEV engine. Available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, it offers a choice between Front-Wheel and All-Wheel Drive, producing either 186 HP or 140 HP. This SUV accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a range of 8.3 to 10.3 seconds, topped off with a maximum speed between 191 and 204 km/h. Its efficient design allows for a consumption rate between 5.7 and 6.6 L/100km, depending on the configuration.
In contrast, the Volkswagen T-Roc offers diversity with both petrol and diesel engine types. With power options ranging from 115 HP up to a sporty 300 HP, the T-Roc can suit a variety of driving styles. The 0 to 100 km/h acceleration varies from a moderate 12.3 seconds in the lower models to a zippy 4.9 seconds in the top-performance variant. Like the CX-30, it offers front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, consuming between 4.7 and 8.5 L/100km.
The Mazda CX-30, measuring 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm wide, and standing 1540 mm high, provides a sleek and assertive presence on the road. It embraces Mazda’s signature design language with a beautifully sculpted body that stands out among its peers.
Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc boasts a compact form at 4236 to 4271 mm in length, and a width of either 1819 or 1811 mm. Its height varies between 1527 and 1584 mm. The T-Roc is noted for its bold visual stance and vibrant aesthetic options that appeal to a youthful and adventurous audience.
On the inside, the Mazda CX-30 and VW T-Roc both cater to comfort and utility with seating for up to five passengers. The CX-30 offers a trunk capacity of 422 to 430 liters, ideal for daily errands and short trips alike. It is designed with ergonomic excellence and refined material quality, aimed at creating an upscale ambiance.
The T-Roc, however, edges ahead with a slightly broader trunk capacity of 392 to 445 liters in the five-door versions, providing a practical edge for those valuing space efficiency. Its interior is characterized by practicality and intuitive technology that ensure a connected journey.
Both models deliver strong performances in terms of environmental impact. The Mazda CX-30 has a CO2 efficiency class ranging from D to E, with CO2 emissions spanning from 129 to 148 g/km. The T-Roc, on the other hand, spans a wider range from D to G class, with emissions tracking between 125 and 194 g/km, offering more variability within its engine choices.
The Mazda CX-30 and VW T-Roc both represent compelling choices in the compact SUV category, each aiming to capture the hearts of drivers with distinct strengths. The CX-30 is inclined towards those valuing refinement and a smooth driving experience, while the T-Roc appeals to those seeking versatility, power, and bold styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two will depend on individual preferences and requirements, along with their respective design and driving dynamics.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda CX-30 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,204 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW T-Roc uses 5.5 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers a bit more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW T-Roc delivers barely more torque with 250 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is barely lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 10 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers markedly more boot space – 430 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 146 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries very slightly more – 515 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.
The Mazda CX-30 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.
details
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
|
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
284 L
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España