VS

VW T-Roc vs MG ZS comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (26,400 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Roc or MG ZS?

VW T-Roc vs MG ZS: Key differences

VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more trunk space
details

MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

T-Roc

MG ZS vs VW T-Roc: A Comprehensive Comparison of Two Compelling SUVs

In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, two models stand out in the compact SUV segment: the MG ZS and the VW T-Roc. While MG has made significant strides in establishing itself as a formidable contender with its electric and hybrid options, VW's T-Roc continues to impress with its versatile engine choices and refinement. This article delves into their specifications, performance attributes, and innovative features, allowing potential buyers to make an informed decision.

ZS

Engine Options and Performance

The MG ZS presents an attractive lineup featuring both electric and hybrid configurations. With a power output ranging from 156 HP to an impressive 197 HP, drivers can choose between a full electric variant with a range of up to 440 km and a hybrid model that focuses on fuel efficiency and low emissions. The ZS boasts a respectable acceleration of 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.6 seconds, coupled with a top speed of 175 km/h.

On the other hand, the VW T-Roc caters to a broader audience by offering petrol and diesel engines, with power outputs ranging from 115 HP to a staggering 300 HP in the high-performance R variant. Acceleration figures vary, with some versions reaching 100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, showcasing the T-Roc's sporty potential. The T-Roc's top speed can reach up to 250 km/h, making it not just an eco-friendly SUV but also a thrilling ride.

T-Roc

Transmission and Fuel Efficiency

The MG ZS is equipped with an automatic transmission that includes both a reduction gearbox and an automatic gearbox, ensuring a smooth driving experience with commendable fuel consumption rates of approximately 5 L/100 km for the hybrid version. The electric variant, on the other hand, has an energy consumption of around 17.3 kWh/100 km, emphasizing its eco-friendly credentials.

The VW T-Roc, meanwhile, offers a choice between manual and automatic transmissions, with dual-clutch options available for sportier performance. Fuel consumption varies based on the engine choice, with efficient diesel engines returning as low as 4.7 L/100 km, while high-performance petrol versions consume up to 8.5 L/100 km under more demanding driving conditions.

ZS

Innovative Technologies and Features

When it comes to technology, the MG ZS keeps pace with modern expectations, featuring a user-friendly infotainment system that supports smartphone connectivity. Safety features abound in the ZS, with advanced driver-assistance systems enhancing peace of mind on the road.

The VW T-Roc, however, takes the lead in terms of tech advancements and premium features. Its cutting-edge digital cockpit provides customizable displays for a modern touch. The T-Roc is also equipped with numerous advanced safety features, such as lane assist, adaptive cruise control, and more, ensuring an all-round excellent driving experience.

T-Roc

Dimensions and Practicality

In terms of size, the MG ZS measures 4323 mm in length and 1809 mm in width, providing ample cabin space for five occupants and a trunk capacity of 448 liters. This makes it a practical choice for families and individuals requiring versatility.

The T-Roc, slightly longer at 4236 mm, offers a more refined and spacious cabin with options for both five- and four-seat configurations. The boot space ranges from 392 to 445 liters, providing slightly less than the ZS but still a practical solution for everyday use.

ZS

Final Verdict: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Ultimately, the choice between the MG ZS and the VW T-Roc will depend on individual preferences. The MG ZS excels with its electric and hybrid options, appealing to environmentally conscious drivers seeking cost-effective urban transportation. In contrast, the VW T-Roc impresses with its extensive range of engines, technological innovations, and superior driving dynamics, catering to those craving both comfort and performance.

Whichever SUV you choose, both models promise to deliver in terms of value, performance, and practicality, making them ideal contenders in the fiercely competitive SUV market.

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Roc is about choosing whether you prefer a classic, driver-focused hatchback or a compact SUV with higher ride height and added practicality. The Golf delivers sharper handling and refined efficiency, while the T‑Roc brings more interior space and a more …
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a bolder, slightly sportier compact SUV. Both share similar underpinnings, but the Kamiq excels in interior space and efficiency while the T‑Roc offers sharper styling and a …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Roc

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG ZS is substantially cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,447 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

ZS

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers markedly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW T-Roc delivers considerably more torque with 250 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 102 Nm more.

T-Roc

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is slightly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 135 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW T-Roc offers barely more boot space – 475 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 32 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries marginally more – 515 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG ZS is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £18,000
ZS

MG ZS

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
details
VW T-Roc
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

VW T-Roc

The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)
rate
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca and the VW T‑Roc are two closely related compact crossover SUVs from the Volkswagen Group, each offering a blend of practicality, comfort and engaging driving manners. This comparison will highlight where the Ateca’s straightforward value and roomy practicality differ from the …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
CUPRA Formentor
VW T-Roc
VS
The Cupra Formentor and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that balance everyday practicality with distinct personalities—one leaning sporty and style‑focused, the other aiming for broad appeal and comfort. This quick comparison highlights how the Formentor’s sharper driving character and design …
Audi A3 Sportback
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi A3 Sportback and the VW T‑Roc share many Volkswagen Group underpinnings but target different buyers: the A3 Sportback focuses on refined driving dynamics and premium cabin quality, while the VW T‑Roc offers a taller, more practical crossover package at a more value-driven price. This …
VW T-Roc
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 143 g/km
co2
115 - 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Trunk capacity
443 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Width
1,818 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 515 kg
Payload
375 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Torque
148 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
VW
Brand
MG
What drive types are available for the VW T-Roc?

The VW T-Roc is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.