VS

XPeng G6 vs KGM Musso EV comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 414 HP), boot space and price (37,400 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – XPeng G6 or KGM Musso EV?

XPeng G6 vs KGM Musso EV: Key differences

XPeng G6

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
details

KGM Musso EV

  • barely cheaper
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

G6

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

KGM Musso EV is barely cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the XPeng G6 costs 37,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,380 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the XPeng G6 is clearly more efficient: consuming 17.3 kWh/100km compared to 23 kWh/100km for the KGM Musso EV. That’s a difference of about 5.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the XPeng G6 offers a bit more range – reaching up to 525 km, about 105 km more than the KGM Musso EV.

Musso EV

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G6 offers somewhat more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 414 HP. That’s roughly 73 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G6 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the KGM Musso EV takes 8 s. That’s about 3.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the KGM Musso EV delivers barely more torque with 678 Nm compared to 660 Nm. That’s about 18 Nm more.

G6

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, XPeng G6 is only slightly lighter – 2,065 kg compared to 2,165 kg. The difference is around 100 kg.

When it comes to payload, the KGM Musso EV carries significantly more – 905 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 430 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng G6 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,400
G6

XPeng G6

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 252 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.3 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 455 - 525 km
details

Frequently compared as well

XPeng G6
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
Putting the XPeng G6 and ZEEKR 7GT side-by-side highlights two sharply styled Chinese electric contenders that each promise strong range, advanced tech and engaging performance. I’ll compare driving feel, range, interior quality and ownership value so you can see which one better fits your …
XPeng G6
ZEEKR 7X
VS
XPeng G6 and Zeekr 7X are two advanced Chinese electric crossovers that pack strong tech, long-range batteries and ambitious driver‑assist features. In this head‑to‑head we'll compare performance, range and charging, interior quality and ownership costs so you can pick the better fit for your needs.
XPeng G6
KGM Musso EV

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

XPeng G6

The XPeng G6 is a sleek, tech-focused electric crossover that pairs modern styling with a spacious, comfortable cabin. It delivers a refined, engaging driving experience and comes loaded with advanced driver-assistance and infotainment features that make it feel like a smarter, more connected car.

details
IMG_0237
IMG_0238

Reviews XPeng G6

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
Micha
26 May 2026, 12:50:42

After intensive test drives I ultimately went with the G6P and have never regretted it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Manijak
6 May 2026, 09:37:03

The Sealion is better finished and of higher quality. But it has higher consumption and charges noticeably slower.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Carlos
21 Jan 2026, 18:28:52

The Xpeng G6 strikes me as very convincing when it comes to technology, ultra-fast charging, comfort, and range — definitely worth keeping an eye on.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

KGM Musso EV

The Musso EV blends pickup practicality with an electric drivetrain, delivering quiet performance and a roomy, well-equipped cabin that suits both work and everyday use. Its robust design and straightforward controls make it a compelling choice for buyers who want a capable utility vehicle with cleaner operation.

details
serpimg_XBhXgy

Reviews KGM Musso EV

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

XPeng G6
XPeng G9
VS
The XPeng G6 and XPeng G9 are two electric SUVs aimed at different buyers: the G6 is a compact, agile, tech-focused crossover, while the G9 is a larger, more premium flagship with greater range and comfort. This comparison highlights the key differences in size, range, performance, interior tech, …
XPeng G6
BYD Sealion 7
VS
The XPeng G6 and BYD Sealion 7 are two leading Chinese electric models that pair advanced technology and competitive range with distinct design and driving philosophies. This head‑to‑head compares range, performance, interior tech and ownership costs to help you choose the better fit for your needs.
XPeng G6
XPeng P7+
VS
XPeng’s G6 and the P7+ go head-to-head in a neat battle of priorities: roomy, tech-forward practicality versus sleek, low-drag efficiency and sportier poise. For buyers it boils down to lifestyle — the G6 promises everyday versatility and family-friendly space, while the P7+ sells a more …
XPeng G6
MG MGS6 EV
VS
Choosing between the XPeng G6 and the MG MGS6 EV means weighing XPeng’s tech-heavy, aerodynamic approach against MG’s more value-oriented, practical offering. I’ll break down range, charging, driving feel, interior quality and running costs so you can pick the better fit for your needs.
XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover — the G6 pushes a tech-forward, range-focused EV agenda while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s driver-focused dynamics to electrification. This comparison will cut through spec sheets to show how they differ in …
XPeng G6
XPeng P7
VS
XPeng G6 and XPeng P7 could not be more different in character: the G6 is a roomy, high-riding crossover built for family comfort and gadget-packed practicality, while the P7 remains a sleek, low-slung electric coupe-saloon that rewards you with sharper handling and a more driver-focused feel. Both …
BYD Atto 3
XPeng G6
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the XPeng G6 helps you decide between a compact, value-oriented electric crossover and a more tech-focused, aerodynamic SUV with stronger range and advanced driver aids. I’ll highlight how they differ in range, interior comfort, driving character and ownership costs so …
XPeng G6
smart #5
VS
The XPeng G6 and the Smart #5 represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover — the XPeng G6 emphasizes advanced driver-assist systems and longer-range performance, while the Smart #5 focuses on compact, stylish urban practicality. This comparison will highlight how they differ in …
XPeng G6
KGM Musso EV

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,400 - 44,200 £
Price
36,000 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.3 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
23 - 26 kWh/100km
Electric Range
455 - 525 km
Electric Range
379 - 420 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,220 kg
Curb weight
2,165 - 2,285 kg
Trunk capacity
571 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
470 - 475 kg
Payload
805 - 905 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 487 HP
Power HP
207 - 414 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
440 - 660 Nm
Torque
339 - 678 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
185 - 358 kW
Power kW
152 - 304 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
XPeng
Brand
KGM
Is the XPeng G6 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.