Audi Q4 e-tron alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Audi Q4 e-tron, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Audi Q4 e-tron

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Audi Q4 e-tron and are good next research steps.

from £42,300
iX1

BMW iX1

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 313 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.3 - 15.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 466 - 514 km

BMW iX1 as a suitable alternative to Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you through range, interior space, equipment, driving dynamics, and value to help you decide which suits your needs.

The BMW iX1 is a compact electric crossover that blends BMW's characteristic driving dynamics with a practical, premium interior, making it a strong choice for buyers who want an upscale daily driver with electric efficiency. It delivers composed handling for city and motorway use, while its clean, modern styling and intuitive tech give the cabin an inviting, contemporary feel.

Quick data check: BMW iX1

  • barely cheaper
  • marginally more power
  • a bit more electric range
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space
  • barely more efficient
  • marginally lighter
from £45,200
EX40

Volvo EX40

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 477 - 576 km

Volvo EX40 as a suitable alternative to Audi Q4 e-tron

Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a more polished on-road feel and brand prestige, or the EX40 for smart packaging, intuitive tech, and strong value for money.

The Volvo EX40 is a compact electric SUV that blends Scandinavian minimalism with a comfortable, high-quality interior suited to daily driving and longer trips. It prioritizes safety and intuitive technology, delivering a calm, refined experience that feels mature and easy to live with.

Quick data check: Volvo EX40

  • moderately cheaper
  • moderately more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • very slightly lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
  • noticeably more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
from £32,000
Elroq

Skoda Elroq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 441 - 574 km

Skoda Elroq as a suitable alternative to Audi Q4 e-tron

Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior space, practicality and a more attractive price.

The Skoda Elroq is a practical and well-rounded compact SUV that blends clever packaging with a calm, comfortable ride. It offers a sensible interior, straightforward technology and a value-focused approach, making it a particularly good choice for families and everyday drivers.

Quick data check: Skoda Elroq

  • very slightly more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • very slightly lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
  • noticeably cheaper
from £36,300
Capri

Ford Capri

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 439 - 627 km

Ford Capri as a suitable alternative to Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron and the Ford Capri represent two distinct eras of automotive design and technology, each capturing the hearts of enthusiasts in their own right. While the Q4 e-tron offers cutting-edge electric performance and a high-tech interior, the Capri boasts a classic, sporty aesthetic and a nostalgic driving experience. Ultimately, the choice between these two icons highlights the evolution of the automotive landscape, from raw power and charm to modern efficiency and sophistication.

The Ford Capri turned the family car into something cheekily sporty, with a long, rakish profile that still promises fun at a glance. Today it lives on as a lovable classic — easy to tinker with, enjoyable to drive and guaranteed to raise smiles at any meet.

Quick data check: Ford Capri

  • somewhat cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • barely more trunk space
from £54,400
Q6 e-tron

Audi Q6 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 252 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 535 - 668 km

Audi Q6 e-tron as a suitable alternative to Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron and Audi Q6 e-tron are Audi’s electric SUV siblings: the compact Q4 emphasizes city-friendly size and efficiency, while the Q6 moves upmarket with more interior space, range and advanced tech. This side‑by‑side comparison will show whether the Q4’s agility and value or the Q6’s comfort and long‑range capability better suit your driving needs.

The Audi Q6 e-tron combines Audi's premium design and refined interior with a modern electric drivetrain that delivers effortless, quiet acceleration. It feels spacious and tech-forward, making it a comfortable and confident choice for buyers who want an upscale electric SUV for daily driving and longer trips.

Quick data check: Audi Q6 e-tron

  • noticeably cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • very slightly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
  • noticeably more power
  • a bit more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
from £54,000
EX60

Volvo EX60

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 374 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 611 - 810 km

Volvo EX60 as a suitable alternative to Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron and Volvo EX60 are competing compact premium electric SUVs that take different approaches to design, driving feel and in-cabin experience. This comparison will cut through specs and real-world strengths to help you choose between the Q4 e-tron’s refined driving dynamics and Audi polish, and the EX60’s safety-first, spacious Scandinavian comfort.

The Volvo EX60 is a stylish electric SUV that pairs Scandinavian minimalism with a high-quality, comfortable cabin and an intuitive infotainment experience. It delivers a composed, refined ride with advanced safety and driver-assist systems that make daily driving relaxed and confident.

Quick data check: Volvo EX60

  • visibly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • marginally lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space
  • considerably more power
  • markedly more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.