Audi Q4 e-tron alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Audi Q4 e-tron, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Audi Q4 e-tron

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Audi Q4 e-tron and are good next research steps.

from £45,200
EX40

Volvo EX40

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 477 - 576 km

Volvo EX40 as a suitable alternative to Audi Q4 e-tron

Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a more polished on-road feel and brand prestige, or the EX40 for smart packaging, intuitive tech, and strong value for money.

The Volvo EX40 is a compact electric SUV that blends Scandinavian minimalism with a comfortable, high-quality interior suited to daily driving and longer trips. It prioritizes safety and intuitive technology, delivering a calm, refined experience that feels mature and easy to live with.

Quick data check: Volvo EX40

  • moderately cheaper
  • moderately more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • very slightly lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
  • noticeably more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
from £42,300
iX1

BMW iX1

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 313 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.3 - 15.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 466 - 514 km

BMW iX1 as a suitable alternative to Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you through range, interior space, equipment, driving dynamics, and value to help you decide which suits your needs.

The BMW iX1 is a compact electric crossover that blends BMW's characteristic driving dynamics with a practical, premium interior, making it a strong choice for buyers who want an upscale daily driver with electric efficiency. It delivers composed handling for city and motorway use, while its clean, modern styling and intuitive tech give the cabin an inviting, contemporary feel.

Quick data check: BMW iX1

  • barely cheaper
  • marginally more power
  • a bit more electric range
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space
  • barely more efficient
  • marginally lighter
from £40,200
EV3

Kia EV3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 265 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 572 km

Kia EV3 as a suitable alternative to Audi Q4 e-tron

This comparison puts the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Kia EV3 head-to-head, contrasting Audi’s premium, tech-rich compact electric SUV with Kia’s practical, value-driven EV. Read on to see how they match up on range, comfort, features and running costs so you can choose the right electric car for your needs.

The Kia EV3 is a stylish, user-friendly electric crossover that focuses on practicality and a roomy, well-equipped cabin. It delivers a comfortable ride with intuitive technology and efficient everyday performance, making it a sensible choice for city and family use.

Quick data check: Kia EV3

  • clearly more power
  • very slightly more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
  • very slightly cheaper
  • very slightly lighter
from £32,000
Elroq

Skoda Elroq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 441 - 574 km

Skoda Elroq as a suitable alternative to Audi Q4 e-tron

Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior space, practicality and a more attractive price.

The Skoda Elroq is a practical and well-rounded compact SUV that blends clever packaging with a calm, comfortable ride. It offers a sensible interior, straightforward technology and a value-focused approach, making it a particularly good choice for families and everyday drivers.

Quick data check: Skoda Elroq

  • very slightly more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • very slightly lighter
  • a bit more trunk space
  • noticeably cheaper
from £34,200
Explorer EV

Ford Explorer EV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 417 - 602 km

Ford Explorer EV as a suitable alternative to Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron and the Ford Explorer EV put a premium compact luxury electric SUV up against a larger, family-focused electric crossover — one emphasizes refined driving dynamics and upscale interiors, the other prioritizes space, practicality and towing capability. I’ll compare range, performance, tech and everyday usability to help you decide which electric SUV fits your real-world needs.

The Explorer EV brings the familiar presence and practicality of an Explorer into the electric age, offering roomy comfort and modern tech for everyday life and family trips. It feels composed on the road and serves as a straightforward, user-friendly alternative to conventional gas-powered SUVs.

Quick data check: Ford Explorer EV

  • somewhat more trunk space
  • somewhat cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
from £43,200
GLB

Mercedes GLB

  • Engine Type Electric, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 156 - 354 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.1 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 431 - 631 km

Mercedes GLB as a suitable alternative to Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron and Mercedes GLB both target buyers wanting a premium compact SUV, but they approach that goal very differently. The Q4 e-tron is a purpose-built electric crossover focused on efficiency, tech and a refined ride, while the GLB is a more traditional gasoline-powered (with hybrid options in some markets) compact SUV that emphasizes space, practicality and optional seven-seat versatility.

The Mercedes GLB is a compact luxury SUV that blends smart packaging with a polished, composed driving experience. Its flexible interior and premium feel make it a sensible pick for buyers who want Mercedes comfort and practicality in a smaller footprint.

Quick data check: Mercedes GLB

  • only slightly cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more power
  • barely more electric range
  • moderately lighter
  • barely more trunk space
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.