Hyundai Bayon alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Hyundai Bayon, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Hyundai Bayon and are good next research steps.

from £18,800

Hyundai i20

Price 18,800 - 24,400 £
Body Type Hatchback
Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 90 HP
Consumption L/100km 5.7 L/100km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 11.5 - 12.8 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 172 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3
Model i20
Model i20 1.0 T-GDI
CO2 Efficiency Class D
Trim Level Select, Trend, Trend DCT, Blackline, Blackline DCT, Prime, Prime DCT
Power kW 66 kW
co2 128 - 129 g/km
Engine capacity 998 cm3
Curb weight 1,145 - 1,170 kg
Trunk capacity 352 L
Width 1,775 mm
Brand Hyundai
Payload 455 - 465 kg

details

Hyundai i20 as a suitable alternative to Hyundai Bayon

Choosing between the Hyundai Bayon and the Hyundai i20 comes down to whether you prefer a compact crossover with higher ride height and extra practicality (Bayon) or a sharper, more efficient hatchback with sportier handling (i20). I’ll compare their space, driving feel, fuel economy and equipment so you can pick the one that best fits your daily needs and budget.

The Hyundai i20 is a cheeky small car that mixes smart styling with sensible practicality, feeling more polished and roomy than you might expect for the money. It’s an easy car to live with, offering engaging handling, a comfy cabin and useful equipment that make daily commutes and weekend errands notably less dull.

Quick data check: Hyundai i20

only slightly cheaper
marginally more efficient
marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
very slightly lighter

Compare directly with Hyundai i20

from £20,400

Kia Stonic

Price 20,400 - 26,800 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 100 - 115 HP
Consumption L/100km 5.6 - 5.7 L/100km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.7 - 12.1 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 172 - 200 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3
Model Stonic
Model Stonic 1.0 T-GDI 100, Stonic 1.0 T-GDI 115 48V
CO2 Efficiency Class D
Trim Level Core, Vision, Vision DCT7, Spirit, Spirit DCT7, GT Line, GT Line DCT7
Power kW 74 - 85 kW
co2 126 - 128 g/km
Engine capacity 998 cm3
Curb weight 1,205 - 1,270 kg
Trunk capacity 352 L
Width 1,760 mm
Brand Kia
Payload 440 - 445 kg

details

Kia Stonic as a suitable alternative to Hyundai Bayon

Small crossover, big decisions: the Hyundai Bayon and Kia Stonic duke it out in the compact SUV ring, each promising city-smarts, style and sensible running costs. One brings bold tech and fresh looks, the other leans on practicality and value — so let’s see which small SUV deserves your keys (and your parking spot).

The Kia Stonic is a compact crossover that pairs nimble city manners with a surprisingly spacious and comfortable cabin. It’s a practical, well-equipped choice for buyers who value sensible features, approachable styling and easy everyday usability.

Quick data check: Kia Stonic

only slightly cheaper
visibly more power
marginally more efficient
moderately quicker 0–100 km/h

Compare directly with Kia Stonic

from £23,600

Hyundai Kona

Price 23,600 - 41,900 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Transmission Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 115 - 204 HP
Consumption L/100km 4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range 380 - 510 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.1 - 11.9 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Model Kona
Model Kona 1.0 T-GDI, Kona 1.6 GDI HEV, Kona 1.6 T-GDI, Kona Elektro (49 kWh), Kona Elektro (65 kWh)
CO2 Efficiency Class D, C, E, F, A
Trim Level Select, Select DCT, Trend DCT, N Line DCT, Prime DCT, N Line X DCT, Trend, N Line, Prime, N Line X Allrad DCT, N-Line, N-Line X
Power kW 85 - 150 kW
co2 0 - 163 g/km
Engine capacity 998 - 1,598 cm3
Curb weight 1,370 - 1,773 kg
Trunk capacity 466 L
Width 1,825 mm
Brand Hyundai
Payload 420 - 490 kg
Variant Elektro

details

Hyundai Kona as a suitable alternative to Hyundai Bayon

The Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai Kona are closely related compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a small SUV, but they take different approaches to size, style and capability. This comparison will help you decide whether the Bayon’s city-focused practicality and value or the Kona’s wider engine range and roomier, more versatile package better fits your needs.

The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.

Quick data check: Hyundai Kona

clearly more power
visibly more efficient
substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
a bit more trunk space

Compare directly with Hyundai Kona

from £23,900

Ford Puma

Price 23,900 - 36,300 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 125 - 168 HP
Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range 404 - 417 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.4 - 9.8 s
Model Year 2,025 - 2,026
Torque 170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3
Model Puma
Model Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid, Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid ST, Puma Gen-E
CO2 Efficiency Class D, A
Trim Level Titanium, Titanium PowerShift Automatik, ST-Line, ST-Line PowerShift Automatik, ST-Line X, ST-Line X PowerShift Automatik, PowerShift Automatik, BlueCruise Edition PowerShift Automatik, Premium, BlueCruise Edition
Power kW 92 - 124 kW
co2 0 - 135 g/km
Engine capacity 999 cm3
Curb weight 1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity 456 - 523 L
Width 1,805 mm
Brand Ford
Payload 367 - 469 kg
Variant ST, Gen-E

details

Ford Puma as a suitable alternative to Hyundai Bayon

Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon are compact crossover rivals that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and efficient engines. This quick comparison highlights how they differ in driving feel, cabin practicality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

Quick data check: Ford Puma

clearly more power
barely more efficient
substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
noticeably more trunk space

Compare directly with Ford Puma

from £22,300

Skoda Kamiq

Price 22,300 - 32,700 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 95 - 150 HP
Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.1 - 11 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Model Kamiq
Model Kamiq 1.0 TSI, Kamiq 1.5 TSI ACT
CO2 Efficiency Class D
Trim Level Essence, Selection, Monte Carlo, Essence DSG, Selection DSG, Monte Carlo DSG, Balance, Balance DSG
Power kW 70 - 110 kW
co2 121 - 128 g/km
Engine capacity 999 - 1,498 cm3
Curb weight 1,231 - 1,340 kg
Trunk capacity 400 L
Width 1,793 mm
Brand Skoda
Payload 439 - 539 kg

details

Skoda Kamiq as a suitable alternative to Hyundai Bayon

The Hyundai Bayon and Skoda Kamiq are compact B‑segment crossovers that target buyers wanting small-SUV style with car-like driving manners. The Bayon leans on sharp pricing, bold styling and generous equipment, while the Kamiq is stronger on interior space, ride refinement and everyday practicality—pick the Bayon for value and looks, the Kamiq for comfort and usability.

The Skoda Kamiq is a practical, well-built small crossover that mixes city-friendly manners with surprisingly versatile interior space and clever storage solutions. It offers a comfortable ride, user-friendly technology and solid value, making it a sensible choice for everyday driving.

Quick data check: Skoda Kamiq

markedly more power
marginally more efficient
considerably quicker 0–100 km/h

Compare directly with Skoda Kamiq

from £21,400

VW T-Cross

Price 21,400 - 32,000 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 95 - 150 HP
Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 6 L/100km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.4 - 11.3 s
Model Year 2,024 - 2,025
Torque 175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Model T-Cross
Model T-Cross 1.0 TSI OPF, T-Cross 1.5 TSI ACT OPF
CO2 Efficiency Class D, E
Trim Level Life, ENERGY, Life DSG (7-Gang), ENERGY DSG (7-Gang), Style, Style DSG (7-Gang), R-Line, R-Line DSG (7-Gang)
Power kW 70 - 110 kW
co2 124 - 136 g/km
Engine capacity 999 - 1,498 cm3
Curb weight 1,267 - 1,338 kg
Trunk capacity 455 L
Width 1,784 mm
Brand VW
Payload 463 - 480 kg

details

VW T-Cross as a suitable alternative to Hyundai Bayon

The Hyundai Bayon and VW T‑Cross are two popular compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want small‑car agility with SUV practicality, easy city driving and low running costs. The Bayon punches above its weight on value, tech and bold styling, while the T‑Cross leans towards a more refined interior, conservative design and typically stronger resale — choose the Bayon for everyday value and kit, or the T‑Cross for build quality and long‑term ownership confidence.

The VW T-Cross is a small, city-friendly crossover that blends practical packaging with easygoing driving manners and a high seating position for good visibility. It’s a sensible, comfortable choice for buyers who want the convenience and style of an SUV without big compromises.

Quick data check: VW T-Cross

visibly more power
only slightly more efficient
clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
marginally more trunk space

Compare directly with VW T-Cross

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Hyundai Bayon head-to-head against similar models.

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.