Volvo EX40 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Volvo EX40, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

The Volvo EX40 wraps Scandinavian calm and clever practicality into a compact electric package that feels both premium and refreshingly uncomplicated. It's the grown-up answer to flashier rivals — a safe, comfy, and city-friendly EV with thoughtful tech that makes everyday driving quietly satisfying.

Volvo EX40

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Volvo EX40 and are good next research steps.

from £54,000
EX60

Volvo EX60

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 374 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.7 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 620 - 810 km

Volvo EX60 as a suitable alternative to Volvo EX40

Volvo’s EX40 and EX60 lock horns in a neatly staged duel: the nimble EX40 is a city-savvy, efficiency-first EV built for tight streets and savvy budgets, while the larger EX60 brings more space, stronger performance and longer range for family life and weekend escapes. Pick this showdown for a clear answer to whether you want compact convenience or roomy ambition — with Scandinavian calm and a dash of electric grin.

The Volvo EX60 arrives as a sleek, family-friendly electric SUV that blends Scandinavian restraint with a surprising dash of personality, wrapping a calm, premium cabin around practical everyday usability. It’s aimed at buyers who prize safety and comfort but still want a car that rewards an enthusiastic drive, proving that sensible can be quietly fun.

Quick data check: Volvo EX60

  • markedly cheaper
  • marginally lighter
  • clearly more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
from £39,600
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.9 - 17.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 406 - 554 km

Audi Q4 e-tron as a suitable alternative to Volvo EX40

The Audi Q4 e-tron serves up German poise, refined finishes and a composed highway ride that says "premium" without shouting, while the Volvo EX40 counters with Scandinavian simplicity, clever safety tech and a sprightlier city demeanour. Choose the Q4 for serene comfort and perceived luxury, or the EX40 if you want sharper urban agility, better value and a cabin that feels freshly modern — either car makes electrifying sense.

The Audi Q4 e-tron brings Audi polish into the electric crossover scene, pairing a sleek exterior with a refined, airy interior that makes everyday driving feel distinctly premium. It’s an easy-to-live-with EV that balances comfort and real-world usability with intuitive tech, making it a smart choice for buyers who want electric mobility without giving up Audi character — and yes, it still looks good in the driveway.

Quick data check: Audi Q4 e-tron

  • clearly more power
  • very slightly more electric range
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • very slightly lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
from £36,800
XC40

Volvo XC40

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6.5 L/100km

Volvo XC40 as a suitable alternative to Volvo EX40

Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers petrol, hybrid and electric options plus proven practicality. Go for the EX40 if you want cutting‑edge EV efficiency and playful agility; pick the XC40 if you value versatility, a broader engine choice and tried‑and‑tested everyday usefulness.

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

Quick data check: Volvo XC40

  • significantly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately cheaper
  • markedly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
from £37,900
Elroq

Skoda Elroq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 286 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.2 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 529 - 573 km

Skoda Elroq as a suitable alternative to Volvo EX40

Think of the Volvo EX40 as the cool, safety-obsessed Swede — minimalist cabin, clever tech and a calm, premium feel — while the Skoda Elroq is all about everyday practicality: roomy, sensible and great value for money. Want Scandinavian refinement and understated luxury? Pick the EX40; want space, utility and a smarter wallet decision, the Elroq has your back.

The Skoda Elroq is a sensible, comfort‑focused compact electric SUV that puts a premium on a roomy rear seat, quiet long‑distance manners and straightforward, low‑distraction controls — perfect for families and commuters who value everyday usability. Its practical Simply‑Clever touches and strong value make it a convincing all‑rounder, though those chasing class‑leading fast charging or the most flexible boot space might look elsewhere.

Quick data check: Skoda Elroq

  • clearly more power
  • very slightly more electric range
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
  • a bit cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • somewhat more trunk space
from £45,400
7X

ZEEKR 7X

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 421 - 646 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 19.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 480 - 615 km

ZEEKR 7X as a suitable alternative to Volvo EX40

We pit the cool, safety-first Volvo EX40 against the bold, tech-heavy Zeekr 7X to find out which EV gives you more style, space and everyday usability. Expect Scandinavian minimalism and premium poise to tussle with Zeekr’s gadget-packed practicality and aggressive value—your EV shopping list just got a lot more interesting.

The ZEEKR 7X is a striking entry into the electric vehicle market, blending sleek aesthetics with a promise of cutting-edge technology. Its design exudes modern luxury while offering advanced features tailored for tech-savvy drivers. Positioned as a competitor in the premium electric segment, the 7X aims to deliver a dynamic driving experience alongside eco-friendly credentials.

Quick data check: ZEEKR 7X

  • very slightly cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • slightly lighter
  • clearly more power
  • barely more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
from £44,200
EQA

Mercedes EQA

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 292 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.4 - 16.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 476 - 561 km

Mercedes EQA as a suitable alternative to Volvo EX40

The Mercedes EQA wraps premium Mercedes poise and MBUX polish into a compact EV that feels cosseting and refined, while the Volvo EX40 trades a bit of showroom gloss for Scandi practicality, airy space and a more efficient, no‑nonsense driving character. If you want badge and cabin glamour, go EQA; but for everyday range, space and bang‑for‑buck the EX40 is the sharper, less fussy pick — and your wallet will thank you on the commute.

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

Quick data check: Mercedes EQA

  • only slightly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • only slightly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
  • a bit more efficient
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.