VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Tesla Model Y comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 460 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 34,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Tesla Model Y?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Tesla Model Y: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
details

Tesla Model Y

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron VS Tesla Model Y — a practical primer

Audi Q4 e-tron and Tesla Model Y sit in the same compact‑SUV segment but aim at very different priorities. The Q4 e-tron leans into Audi’s calm, refined execution — subdued cabin, tactile controls and a composed highway demeanour — while the Model Y trades some of that traditional premium feel for maximal space, software polish and efficiency. That contrast shapes everyday life: one feels like a familiar premium car that’s been electrified, the other feels like a roomy, software‑first utility. Read on to see how those choices play out in driving character, comfort, usability and who each car actually fits best.

Model Y

Driving character and on-road behaviour

The Audi Q4 e-tron drives with a measured, composed personality; it soaks up motorway miles with low noise and predictable responses, especially in non‑sport settings. The Tesla Model Y feels more direct and decisive — quicker off the line and more efficient at maintaining pace — but that comes with a firmer ride and a chassis that rewards pace rather than pampering. Q4 e-tron buyers will appreciate a settled feel and steering that favours comfort, whereas Model Y buyers will notice sharper thrust and a more utilitarian, functional driving vibe. If you prefer laid‑back long runs choose the Q4 e-tron; if snap and efficiency matter more, the Model Y will put a smile on your face sooner.

Q4 e-tron

Comfort and long‑distance suitability

On long trips the Q4 e-tron’s real strength is cabin calm: lower perceived wind and road noise and physical climate controls that are easy to operate while cruising make fatigue less likely. The Model Y is also surprisingly hushed after recent updates and benefits from planning and charging tools that simplify long runs, which reduces stress for regular motorway travel. The trade‑off is that the Model Y’s suspension tends to feel firmer over poor surfaces and many functions live behind a touchscreen, which some find wearing on long days. For relaxed four‑hour stints pick the Q4 e-tron for ambience; for economical, low‑hassle itineraries the Model Y’s charging ecosystem and efficiency are compelling.

Model Y

Cabin, controls and perceived quality

Audi Q4 e-tron presents a familiar premium layout with clear climate buttons and an orderly dash, but closer inspection reveals hard plastics in secondary areas that temper the luxury impression. Tesla Model Y offers a minimalist, tech‑forward cabin with a big central display and newfound material improvements, yet its button‑less approach and lack of smartphone mirroring frustrate people who miss physical shortcuts. Practical touches split the picture: the Model Y gives you extra storage and a front trunk, while the Q4 e-tron keeps essentials easy to reach and more conventionally arranged. If tactile interfaces and a traditional premium feel matter, the Q4 e-tron will please; if you prioritise space and software polish, the Model Y delivers more utility per euro.

Q4 e-tron

Practicality, family use and city friendliness

The Tesla Model Y is the roomier choice on packaging — generous rear legroom, a huge boot and additional front storage make it the pragmatic family hauler of the two. The Audi Q4 e-tron still scores as a family car thanks to a flat rear floor, good child‑seat access and a generally sensible layout, but it offers less cargo volume and no front storage compartment. Urban buyers will notice the Q4 e-tron’s smaller turning circle in rear‑drive guise and slightly better manoeuvrability, whereas the Model Y’s larger footprint and restricted rear visibility can make tight parking more effortful despite cameras. Families who haul luggage or sports kit regularly will favour the Model Y; city dwellers or those who value easier parking and traditional ergonomics will tilt toward the Q4 e-tron.

Model Y

Who should consider each car — buying trade‑offs

Choose the Audi Q4 e-tron if you value a quieter, more traditionally premium cabin, simple physical controls and a relaxed motorway demeanour; it’s aimed at comfort‑oriented commuters and buyers who want an Audi feel in an EV package. Opt for the Tesla Model Y if you prioritise real‑world efficiency, maximum interior and cargo space, tight integration with a charging ecosystem and brisk performance — it suits families and frequent long‑distance drivers who accept touchscreen‑led ergonomics. Each car makes clear trade‑offs between ambience and tech/space, so pick the side that matches your daily routine: the Q4 e-tron for composed premium comfort, the Model Y for efficient space and software convenience — the technical comparison that follows will make those trade‑offs concrete.

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Tesla Model Y is moderately cheaper – starting at 34,300 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,437 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Tesla Model Y is a bit more efficient: consuming 13.1 kWh/100km compared to 14.8 kWh/100km for the Audi Q4 e-tron. That’s a difference of about 1.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Tesla Model Y offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 622 km, about 30 km more than the Audi Q4 e-tron.

Model Y

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model Y offers noticeably more power – delivering 460 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 120 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model Y is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.5 s, while the Audi Q4 e-tron takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers only slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 660 Nm. That’s about 19 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Tesla Model Y offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Tesla Model Y is very slightly lighter – 1,976 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 59 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Tesla Model Y offers markedly more boot space – 836 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 301 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q4 e-tron carries very slightly more – 515 kg compared to 472 kg. That’s a difference of about 43 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Tesla Model Y is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,300
Model Y

Tesla Model Y

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 299 - 460 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 534 - 622 km
details
Audi Q4 e-tron
Tesla Model Y

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Tesla Model Y

The Tesla Model Y is a compact electric SUV that pairs practical interior space with a minimalist, tech-forward cabin that feels modern and airy. Its confident electric performance and suite of driver-assist features make everyday driving effortless, and regular software updates help the car stay fresh over time.

details
0x0-ModelY_07
0x0-ModelY_01
0x0-ModelY_17
0x0-ModelY_19

Reviews Tesla Model Y

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Franz
15 Sept 2025, 11:46:15

The Model Y has the perfect range for me!!!

Frequently compared as well

Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Toyota C-HR represent two different approaches to compact crossovers: the Model Y emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and spacious practicality, while the C-HR focuses on bold styling, efficient combustion options and affordability. This comparison cuts through specs and …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake
Tesla Model Y
VS
The Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake and the Tesla Model Y represent two distinct takes on the premium compact family car — the CLA blends elegant, coupe‑like shooting‑brake styling and traditional Mercedes refinement, while the Model Y focuses on electric range, interior space and tech. This quick …
Tesla Model Y
Volvo EX60
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Volvo EX60 are two of the most compelling electric SUVs on the market, each leaning into different strengths: Tesla with its software-first approach and industry-leading charging network, Volvo with Scandinavian design, comfort and a strong safety focus. If you prioritise …
Tesla Model Y
MG MGS6 EV
VS
This comparison pits the Tesla Model Y against the MG MGS6 EV, letting you weigh a tech-forward, long-range crossover against a value-focused electric alternative. We'll focus on range, performance, practicality and running costs so you can decide which electric SUV suits your priorities.
Tesla Model Y
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
The Tesla Model Y and the ZEEKR 7GT represent two different philosophies in the electric-SUV space: the Model Y emphasizes range, efficiency and Tesla’s integrated software and charging ecosystem, while the ZEEKR 7GT prioritizes a more luxurious cabin, refined ride and feature-rich hardware. Which …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Kia EV3
VS
This comparison puts the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Kia EV3 head-to-head, contrasting Audi’s premium, tech-rich compact electric SUV with Kia’s practical, value-driven EV. Read on to see how they match up on range, comfort, features and running costs so you can choose the right electric car for your …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Tesla Model Y

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
34,300 - 53,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
534 - 622 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
1,976 - 2,108 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
822 - 836 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
435 - 472 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
299 - 460 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 7.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
220 - 338 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Tesla
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.