Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Toyota Aygo – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Toyota Aygo?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Toyota Aygo has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15500 £, while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £. That’s a price difference of around 17666 £.
Aygo
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 has a convincingly edge – offering 218 HP compared to 72 HP. That’s roughly 146 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Toyota Aygo takes 15.50 s. That’s about 9.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Alpine A290 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 170 km/h, while the Toyota Aygo tops out at 158 km/h. The difference is around 12 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Alpine A290 pulls significantly stronger with 300 Nm compared to 93 Nm. That’s about 207 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Alpine A290 offers somewhat more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Toyota Aygo is clearly lighter – 1015 kg compared to 1479 kg. The difference is around 464 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Alpine A290 offers noticeable more room – 326 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 95 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Alpine A290 performs distinct better – up to 1106 L, which is about 277 L more than the Toyota Aygo.
When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 evident takes the win – 471 kg compared to 345 kg. That’s a difference of about 126 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Alpine A290 shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £33,200
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Toyota Aygo
The Toyota Aygo presents itself as a compact city car, perfect for navigating tight urban spaces with ease. Its stylish design is complemented by a vibrant variety of colour options, making it a standout choice for those looking to express their individuality. Inside, the Aygo offers a comfortable and functional cabin, equipped with modern features that enhance the overall driving experience.
details
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Alpine A290
Toyota Aygo
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
15500 - 22100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 4.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
108 - 111 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1015 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
3700 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1740 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1510 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
829 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
345 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
72 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
15.5 - 15.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
151 - 158 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
93 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
53 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.