VS

Audi e-tron GT vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (843 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (93,300 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi e-tron GT or Mazda CX-30?

Audi e-tron GT vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

Audi e-tron GT

  • substantially more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

e-tron GT

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Audi e-tron GT costs 93,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 67,637 £.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi e-tron GT offers substantially more power – delivering 843 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 657 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi e-tron GT is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.9 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 5.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi e-tron GT delivers substantially more torque with 1,027 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 787 Nm more.

e-tron GT

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-30 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is considerably lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 2,355 kg. The difference is around 900 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers very slightly more boot space – 430 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries barely more – 496 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi e-tron GT is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £93,300
e-tron GT

Audi e-tron GT

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 503 - 843 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.9 - 19 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 582 - 617 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
VW Golf
VS
Mazda CX-30 vs Golf — two compact, sensible choices that target slightly different needs: the CX-30 brings SUV styling and a premium-feel cabin, while the Golf is the benchmark compact hatch for everyday practicality and versatility. Below I’ll run through the strengths and trade‑offs so you can …
Audi e-tron GT
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi e-tron GT

The Audi e-tron GT is a striking electric grand tourer that blends dramatic, low-slung styling with the hushed refinement of a luxury saloon. Behind the beautiful skin you'll find a driver-focused cabin and brisk, silent performance that makes daily commutes feel like auditioning for a weekend road trip — and yes, it manages to be both serious and a little bit smug about it.

details
A210772_overfull
A210761_overfull
A210763_overfull
A210762_overfull
A210735_overfull
A211416_overfull
A211417_overfull
A211462_overfull

Reviews Audi e-tron GT

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that each aim to combine everyday practicality with a touch of style, but they take different routes on ride feel, interior quality and tech. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the CX-30’s near-premium cabin and engaging …
Audi Q2
Mazda CX-30
VS
Audi Q2 and Mazda CX-30 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi Q2 or the Mazda CX-30 is …
Mazda CX-30
Opel Mokka
VS
Mazda CX-30 and Opel Mokka go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-30 or the Opel …
Mazda CX-30
Renault Captur
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a premium interior and sporty driving dynamics that set it apart from the Renault Captur, which excels in practicality and customizable design. While the CX-30 appeals to those seeking a more engaging experience behind the wheel, the …
Audi e-tron GT
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
93,300 - 137,600 £
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.9 - 19 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
582 - 617 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,355 - 2,395 kg
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity
350 - 405 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,964 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
455 - 485 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
503 - 843 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.9 - 4.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
625 - 1,027 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
370 - 620 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
Is the Audi e-tron GT offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi e-tron GT is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.