Compare performance (300 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (24,900 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q2 or Volvo EX40?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The compact luxury SUV segment has recently gained two noteworthy contenders: the Audi Q2 and the Volvo EX40. Both vehicles promise a blend of style, performance, and modern technology, but they cater to slightly different audiences. In this comparison, we delve into their technical aspects and innovative features to help you decide which might be the better fit for your needs.
The Audi Q2 embodies the classic Audi design language, with a sporty silhouette and a bold front grille. Measuring 4,208 mm in length and 1,794 mm in width, it presents a compact yet assertive stance. Its height of 1,508 mm enables a comfortable seating position, accommodating five passengers without sacrificing cargo space, which stands at 405 liters.
On the other hand, the Volvo EX40 offers a more robust and contemporary design, highlighted by its smooth curves and elegant lines. With a length of 4,440 mm, a width of 1,863 mm, and a height of 1,647 mm, the EX40 is slightly larger than the Q2, which translates into a more spacious interior and a trunk capacity of 410 liters. Both vehicles have five doors, ensuring easy access for passengers and cargo alike.
The Audi Q2 is versatile in its engine offerings, available in both petrol and diesel options with power outputs ranging from 116 HP to a thrilling 300 HP in the high-performance variant. Transmission choices include both manual and dual-clutch automatic options, along with front-wheel and all-wheel-drive systems. The Q2 accelerates from 0-100 km/h in as little as 4.9 seconds, showcasing its performance capabilities.
In contrast, the Volvo EX40 stands out as an all-electric SUV. It offers power outputs from 238 HP to an impressive 408 HP. With a seamless automatic transmission employing a reduction gearbox, the EX40 can sprint from 0-100 km/h in just 4.6 seconds. The electric range of the EX40 is also noteworthy, reaching up to 576 km on a single charge with a battery capacity reaching 79 kWh, making it ideal for environmentally conscious drivers.
Efficiency is a critical factor for many SUV buyers today. The Audi Q2, with its various engine configurations, shows a competitive fuel consumption of between 4.8 and 8.4 L/100 km, depending on the variant chosen. CO2 emissions range accordingly, with some models classified as efficient, while others fall into less environmentally-friendly categories.
On the other hand, the Volvo EX40 excels with its zero-emission electric powertrain, boasting a CO2 rating of 0 g/km. This positions it firmly in the A efficiency class, appealing to eco-conscious consumers who wish to minimize their carbon footprint while enjoying the comforts of an SUV.
Both models showcase cutting-edge technology. The Audi Q2 comes equipped with the latest MMI infotainment system, featuring a user-friendly interface, smartphone integration, and a digital cockpit that enhances the driving experience. Safety features are top-notch, with multiple driver assistance technologies available, including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist.
Volvo, known for its safety-first philosophy, integrates advanced technology in the EX40 as well. The vehicle features an intuitive infotainment system powered by Google, offering seamless app integration and voice control for an enhanced driving experience. Advanced safety systems include lane-keeping assistance, collision avoidance technology, and much more, ensuring peace of mind for drivers and passengers alike.
Choosing between the Audi Q2 and the Volvo EX40 ultimately depends on your priorities. If you prefer a traditional combustion engine with sporty performance and a variety of options, the Q2 might be your best bet. However, for those leaning toward electric mobility with a spacious interior and top-tier technology, the EX40 is a compelling choice. Each vehicle brings its unique strengths to the table, making this comparison more about personal preference than outright superiority.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Audi Q2 is significantly cheaper – starting at 24,900 £ , while the Volvo EX40 costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,991 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX40 offers visibly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 300 HP. That’s roughly 142 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX40 is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Audi Q2 takes 4.9 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX40 delivers clearly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 270 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi Q2 is substantially lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 2,040 kg. The difference is around 710 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Volvo EX40 offers only slightly more boot space – 410 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 5 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q2 carries only slightly more – 510 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.
The Volvo EX40 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q2 packs Audi’s premium attitude into a compact, cheeky package that turns city streets into a runway for tasteful design and clever practicality. It’s an easy car to live with thanks to an upscale cabin, composed manners and sprightly handling, and while it won’t satisfy someone chasing sports-car thrills, it’s a smart, stylish pick for buyers who want substance with a wink.
details
The Volvo EX40 wraps Scandinavian calm and clever practicality into a compact electric package that feels both premium and refreshingly uncomplicated. It's the grown-up answer to flashier rivals — a safe, comfy, and city-friendly EV with thoughtful tech that makes everyday driving quietly satisfying.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,900 - 43,600 £
|
Price
42,800 - 58,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
480 - 576 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
127 - 183 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,610 kg
|
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,170 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
355 - 405 L
|
Trunk capacity
410 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,440 mm
|
|
Width
1,794 - 1,802 mm
|
Width
1,863 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,647 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,400 L
|
|
Payload
450 - 510 kg
|
Payload
430 - 480 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 300 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España