Compare performance (272 HP vs 148 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 29,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Renault Austral?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to choosing a versatile SUV, the Audi Q3 and Renault Austral are two strong contenders in the field. Both bring their unique strengths to the table, but how do they compare when pitted directly against each other? Let's dive into the technical aspects and innovations that set these models apart.
The 2024 Audi Q3 offers a range of engine options, with power outputs ranging from 150 HP to an impressive 245 HP. Available in both petrol and diesel variants with different configurations, the Q3 offers a blend of manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions alongside front-wheel and all-wheel drive options. Its acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h can be as swift as 5.8 seconds, depending on the variant. Coupled with a robust torque output reaching up to 400 Nm, the Q3 clearly demonstrates a focus on performance.
Comparatively, the Renault Austral provides a more environmentally conscientious option with its petrol MHEV and full hybrid powertrains. It delivers a maximum of 200 HP with an acceleration time of 8.4 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h. The Renault Austral is strictly front-wheel drive and offers a unique approach with a CVT automatic gearbox, prioritizing efficiency with a commendable maximum torque of 270 Nm.
In terms of fuel consumption, the Audi Q3 varies from 5.5 L/100km to 8.5 L/100km, while its CO2 emissions range between 143 to 193 g/km. The Q3's diverse range of configurations broadens choice for those who may prioritize efficiency alongside power.
The Renault Austral stands out with a lower fuel consumption of 4.7 L/100km and emissions as low as 105 g/km in its hybrid option, reflecting its strong stance on eco-friendliness, thanks to its advanced hybrid technology. For those prioritizing a greener drive, the Austral makes a compelling case.
Dimension-wise, the Renault Austral is slightly longer at 4510 mm compared to the Audi Q3's 4500 mm. However, the Q3 does offer a slightly wider and taller build. Both models comfortably seat five passengers and feature five doors. In terms of trunk space, the Q3 takes the lead with a trunk capacity of 530 L, compared to the Austral's 500 L or 430 L, making it a slightly better option for those needing more cargo space.
Both SUVs are equipped with the latest technology and comfort features. Audi equips the Q3 with advanced infotainment systems, driver-assist technologies, and options for luxurious interiors, maintaining its reputation for offering premium experiences.
Renault, however, doesn't lag far behind. The Austral features advanced connectivity options and driver assistance systems while focusing keenly on providing a smooth, economical, and technology-friendly driving experience through its hybrid innovations.
The choice between the Audi Q3 and Renault Austral ultimately depends on what you value more in a vehicle. If you are searching for a high-performing SUV with a variety of configurations, the Audi Q3 offers versatility and power. However, if you are keen on an ecologically thoughtful driving experience with hybrid innovations, the Renault Austral could be the more desirable choice.
Both models offer unique features and capabilities, making this a tough choice for potential buyers. Either way, opting for either the Q3 or Austral ensures a ride that balances practicality with style and innovation.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Austral is noticeably cheaper – starting at 29,900 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,314 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Renault Austral with 6.4 L/100km. The difference is about 4.7 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers considerably more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 148 HP. That’s roughly 124 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Renault Austral takes 9.9 s. That’s about 4.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers markedly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Austral is barely lighter – 1,548 kg compared to 1,635 kg. The difference is around 87 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q3 carries somewhat more – 535 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 80 kg.
The Audi Q3 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q3 is a compact premium crossover that blends sharp styling with a well-crafted interior, making it an appealing choice for urban drivers who want a touch of luxury. It delivers a composed ride, intuitive tech features and a practical cabin, so it works well as a comfortable daily driver with an upscale feel.
details
The Renault Austral is a stylish, well-built crossover that blends a comfortable ride with a spacious, modern cabin. It combines everyday-friendly refinement and contemporary technology with a focus on safety and practicality, making it a sensible choice for drivers who want an all-round family car.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
|
Price
29,900 - 34,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
co2
145 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
|
Curb weight
1,548 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Payload
455 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
148 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
109 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España