Compare performance (272 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Skoda Enyaq?
In the world of compact SUVs, two contenders stand out with their unique offerings: the Audi Q3 and the Skoda Enyaq. While the Audi Q3 represents the traditional yet advanced internal combustion engine segment, the Skoda Enyaq emerges as a formidable challenger in the electric SUV category. Let's delve into the details to see which vehicle suits your lifestyle and needs better.
The Audi Q3 is equipped with both petrol and diesel options, offering a range of power outputs from 150 to 245 HP (110 to 180 kW), with various configurations of torque between 250 and 400 Nm. The Q3 can zip from 0 to 100 km/h in as quick as 5.8 seconds, reflecting its sporty nature. This model supports both front-wheel and all-wheel-drive setups, providing flexibility based on driving preferences. With a range of six-speed manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, it caters to diverse driving styles.
Meanwhile, the Skoda Enyaq, being an all-electric vehicle, boasts impressive torque ranging from 310 Nm to 679 Nm, with power outputs from 204 to 340 HP (150 to 250 kW). The Enyaq accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in as low as 5.5 seconds. The electric powertrain delivers instant torque and a smooth ride, available in rear-wheel and all-wheel-drive configurations, making it an exhilarating yet sustainable option.
On the efficiency front, the Audi Q3 offers fuel consumption between 5.5 to 8.5 L/100 km. Combined with fuel tank capacities of 58 to 60 liters, it provides a comfortable driving range on long trips. CO2 emissions range from 142 to 193 g/km, depending on the engine's power and performance characteristics.
The Skoda Enyaq shines with an all-electric range from 432 km up to an impressive 587 km on a single charge, thanks to its substantial battery options of 59 kWh and 77 kWh. With zero emissions, it positions itself as the environmentally-friendly choice amongst SUVs. The efficient consumption rates range between 14.6 to 16.4 kWh/100 km, ensuring cost-effective driving without compromising on performance.
Both vehicles comfortably accommodate five passengers, ensuring a family-friendly environment. The Audi Q3 features a trunk capacity of 530 liters, slightly lower than the Enyaq's 570 to 585 liters, offering ample space for luggage and daily essentials.
The Skoda Enyaq, with its electric platform, utilizes cabin space efficiently, providing a roomier interior feel. The Audi Q3 maintains its luxurious appeal, with high-quality materials and technology aimed at comfort and convenience.
Size-wise, the Audi Q3 measures between 4484 mm to 4500 mm in length, 1843 mm to 1849 mm in width, and 1567 mm to 1585 mm in height. It carries a classic design with a modern twist, favored by many seeking a sleek and sporty exterior.
The Skoda Enyaq, with slightly more size presence at 4649 mm to 4658 mm in length and 1879 mm in width, offers a bolder and contemporary aesthetic, appealing to drivers looking for innovation and style. Its taller stance (1620 mm to 1623 mm) contributes to a commanding road presence.
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and Skoda Enyaq revolves around personal preferences and lifestyle needs. The Audi Q3 is ideal for those who prefer a traditional but sporty drive with a touch of luxury. On the other hand, the Skoda Enyaq caters to environmentally conscious drivers seeking an efficient, spacious, and high-tech driving experience.
Ultimately, both models encapsulate the best of innovative design and engineering, each excelling in their respective domains. Deciding which SUV suits you best depends on weighing the benefits of combustion power versus electric efficiency and style.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Audi Q3 is marginally cheaper – starting at 38,200 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,686 £.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers considerably more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 468 km more than the Audi Q3.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Audi Q3 takes 5.7 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 279 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is clearly lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 544 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more boot space – 585 L compared to 488 L. That’s a difference of about 97 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q3 carries only slightly more – 535 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 46 kg.
The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.
details
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
|
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
|
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España