VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Ford Ranger comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Ford Ranger?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Ford Ranger: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
details

Ford Ranger

details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi Q4 e-tron is somewhat cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,725 £.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers substantially more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 550 km more than the Ford Ranger.

Ranger

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers moderately more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 59 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers very slightly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 18 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is somewhat lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 370 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries considerably more – 989 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 474 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 440 - 592 km
Audi Q4 e-tron
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
Audi Q4 e-tron
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption

Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
42 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
70 - 265 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,918 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
845 - 989 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.