Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi Q4 e-tron vs MINI Aceman comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or MINI Aceman?
Audi Q4 e-tron vs MINI Aceman: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q4 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
MINI Aceman is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,714 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is very slightly more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 14.8 kWh/100km for the Audi Q4 e-tron. That’s a difference of about 0.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers considerably more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 237 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Aceman
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers noticeably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 329 Nm more.
Q4 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is moderately lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 315 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers considerably more boot space – 535 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 235 L.
When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries marginally more – 530 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £40,700
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q4 e-tron
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q4 e-tron
The Audi Q4 e-tron brings Audi polish into the electric crossover scene, pairing a sleek exterior with a refined, airy interior that makes everyday driving feel distinctly premium. It’s an easy-to-live-with EV that balances comfort and real-world usability with intuitive tech, making it a smart choice for buyers who want electric mobility without giving up Audi character — and yes, it still looks good in the driveway.
details
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Audi Q4 e-tron
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
|
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
|
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
|
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,865 mm
|
Width
1,754 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 515 kg
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
MINI
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.