VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Nissan Interstar comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 36,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Nissan Interstar?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Nissan Interstar: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • very slightly lighter
details

Nissan Interstar

  • a bit cheaper
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Nissan Interstar is a bit cheaper – starting at 36,200 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,555 £.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers clearly more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 182 km more than the Nissan Interstar.

Interstar

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 170 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers substantially more torque with 679 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 299 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Audi Q4 e-tron offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is very slightly lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 18 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries considerably more – 1,447 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 932 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 440 - 592 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Alain
10 Jun 2026, 00:16:47

A more attractive vehicle inside and out, with German reliability.

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details
serpimg_9dGXeC

Reviews Nissan Interstar

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Ford Capri
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and the Ford Capri represent two distinct eras of automotive design and technology, each capturing the hearts of enthusiasts in their own right. While the Q4 e-tron offers cutting-edge electric performance and a high-tech interior, the Capri boasts a classic, sporty aesthetic and …
Nissan Interstar
Renault Master Transporter
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Interstar and the Renault Master comes down to balancing payload, practicality and running costs for light commercial use. This comparison will cover cargo capacity, engines, fuel economy, driving comfort and ownership costs so you can pick the van that best fits your …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and Audi Q6 e-tron are Audi’s electric SUV siblings: the compact Q4 emphasizes city-friendly size and efficiency, while the Q6 moves upmarket with more interior space, range and advanced tech. This side‑by‑side comparison will show whether the Q4’s agility and value or the Q6’s …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Ford Explorer EV
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and the Ford Explorer EV put a premium compact luxury electric SUV up against a larger, family-focused electric crossover — one emphasizes refined driving dynamics and upscale interiors, the other prioritizes space, practicality and towing capability. I’ll compare range, …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Enyaq
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and Skoda Enyaq are closely related electric SUVs that share VW Group underpinnings but take different approaches to design, equipment and driving character. This comparison focuses on practicality, driving experience, technology and value to help you decide which fits your needs.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX60
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and Volvo EX60 are competing compact premium electric SUVs that take different approaches to design, driving feel and in-cabin experience. This comparison will cut through specs and real-world strengths to help you choose between the Q4 e-tron’s refined driving dynamics and Audi …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q4 e‑tron feels like the sensible, tech‑savvy choice — airy cabin, clever packaging and a polished, Scandinavian calm that suits family life and long commutes. The BMW iX3, by contrast, plays the sporty, driver‑centric card with taut handling and BMW polish, so pick the Q4 for everyday …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
410 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 205 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Nissan
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.