Compare performance (367 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (46,400 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q5 or VW T-Roc?
The SUV segment is crowded with contenders promising performance, luxury, and practicality. Among them, the Audi Q5 and the VW T-Roc stand out, each offering its own flavor of these attributes. Let's delve into the technical aspects and innovations that set these two apart.
The Audi Q5 comes with an impressive array of engine options, including diesel mild-hybrid, petrol mild-hybrid, and plug-in hybrid variants. Power output ranges from 163 to 367 HP, with torque spanning from 320 to a staggering 700 Nm. The Q5's transmission system includes a dual-clutch automatic gearbox that enhances the driving experience with seamless shifts.
On the other hand, the VW T-Roc offers a more limited but robust selection of petrol and diesel engines, with power ranging from 115 to 300 HP. The T-Roc provides both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmission options, catering to different driving preferences. Despite having fewer options than the Q5, the T-Roc’s 4.9-second sprint to 100 km/h in its top variant speaks volumes of its sporty capabilities.
In terms of fuel consumption, the Audi Q5 plug-in hybrid boasts an electric range of up to 62 km, providing a greener option for city commute. The CO2 emissions vary across models, with the plug-in hybrid being more efficient, offering as low as 35 grams per kilometer.
VW T-Roc’s CO2 emissions start at 125 g/km and its fuel consumption is competitive, with figures as low as 4.7 liters/100 km for the most efficient diesel variant. The T-Roc's efficient petrol and diesel variants ensure practicality for those conscious of fuel expenses while maintaining moderate ecological impact.
The Audi Q5’s larger stature is reflected in its dimensions. It stretches up to 4,717 mm in length, providing ample space inside, and boasts a trunk capacity of up to 520 liters, making it ideal for family use or long journeys with plenty of luggage.
The VW T-Roc, albeit more compact with a maximum length of 4,271 mm, still offers generous space for an urban SUV, with a trunk capacity of up to 445 liters. This makes it an excellent choice for city dwellers seeking a blend of style and practicality without compromising on function.
True to its premium brand reputation, the Audi Q5 delivers luxury in spades. With high-quality materials and an array of technology features, it creates an upscale ambiance. Features like advanced digital displays, seamless connectivity options, and driver assistance systems make it a pleasure to drive or travel in.
The VW T-Roc, while positioned lower in the luxury ladder, brings a youthful and vibrant design ethos inside and out. It offers a surprising array of features for its class, including a digital cockpit and options for customizable interiors, ensuring it doesn’t fall behind in terms of contemporary comforts and technology.
In the grand scheme of things, choosing between the Audi Q5 and the VW T-Roc boils down to personal preference and needs. The Q5 appeals to those who seek luxury, a range of high-performance engine choices, and advanced technology. Meanwhile, the T-Roc is perfect for drivers seeking an efficient, sporty, and stylish SUV that fits well in urban landscapes. Both vehicles showcase the innovation and engineering excellence associated with German automobile craftsmanship.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
VW T-Roc is substantially cheaper – starting at 26,400 £ , while the Audi Q5 costs 46,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,933 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q5 uses 2.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q5 offers considerably more power – delivering 367 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 217 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q5 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 4.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q5 delivers significantly more torque with 580 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 330 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW T-Roc is noticeably lighter – 1,465 kg compared to 1,910 kg. The difference is around 445 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q5 offers substantially more boot space – 520 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 236 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q5 carries barely more – 565 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.
The Audi Q5 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q5 feels like the sensible luxury choice — polished cabin materials, a calm ride and enough tech to keep commuters and weekend adventurers equally pleased. It won't shout for attention but will quietly check the boxes for buyers who want refinement, space and everyday usability with a dash of Audi charisma.
details
The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
46,400 - 79,600 £
|
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 8.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
92 - 100 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
56 - 189 g/km
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,910 - 2,245 kg
|
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
433 - 520 L
|
Trunk capacity
284 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
490 - 565 kg
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 367 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
340 - 580 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
150 - 270 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,968 - 2,995 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España