Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
BMW iX vs Skoda Enyaq comparison
Compare performance (659 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (71,600 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW iX or Skoda Enyaq?
BMW iX vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Video - Skoda Enyaq
iX
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Enyaq is substantially cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the BMW iX costs 71,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 34,723 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is a bit more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 17.8 kWh/100km for the BMW iX. That’s a difference of about 2.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the BMW iX offers a bit more range – reaching up to 701 km, about 112 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW iX offers significantly more power – delivering 659 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 319 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW iX is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW iX delivers clearly more torque with 1,015 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 336 Nm more.
iX
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is noticeably lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,525 kg. The difference is around 451 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more boot space – 585 L compared to 500 L. That’s a difference of about 85 L.
When it comes to payload, the BMW iX carries barely more – 575 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The BMW iX comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £71,600
BMW iX
BMW iX
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
BMW iX
The BMW iX arrives like a tech-rich luxury SUV that refuses to shout, offering a serene yet authoritative road presence that suits both city commutes and long-distance cruising. Inside, its minimalist cabin wraps high-quality materials and clever interfaces around a driver-focused layout, making it feel more like a forward-thinking lounge than just another electric appliance — and yes, it still delivers the dynamic driving character you'd expect from a BMW.
details
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.
details
BMW iX
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
71,600 - 108,400 £
|
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 20.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
600 - 701 km
|
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,525 - 2,655 kg
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
500 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,970 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 575 kg
|
Payload
449 - 526 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
408 - 659 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 5.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
700 - 1,015 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
300 - 485 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.