VS

BMW iX2 vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (313 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW iX2 or Toyota C-HR+?

BMW iX2 vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

BMW iX2

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Toyota C-HR+

  • visibly cheaper
  • marginally more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • slightly more electric range
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

iX2

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Toyota C-HR+ is visibly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the BMW iX2 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,723 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota C-HR+ is only slightly more efficient: consuming 13.4 kWh/100km compared to 14.4 kWh/100km for the BMW iX2. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers slightly more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 95 km more than the BMW iX2.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers marginally more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 313 HP. That’s roughly 30 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the BMW iX2 takes 5.6 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW iX2 delivers clearly more torque with 494 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 156 Nm more.

iX2

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR+ is very slightly lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 1,960 kg. The difference is around 150 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW iX2 offers noticeably more boot space – 525 L compared to 416 L. That’s a difference of about 109 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries visibly more – 655 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 145 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 458 - 607 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison looks at the Toyota bZ4X versus the Toyota C‑HR: both are compact crossovers but take very different approaches — the bZ4X is a purpose‑built all‑electric SUV while the C‑HR is Toyota’s stylish, efficient petrol/hybrid crossover. I’ll run through the key differences in driving range …
BMW iX2
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW iX2

The BMW iX2 cuts a sporty silhouette and delivers the buttoned-up premium feel you expect from the brand, wrapped in a compact electric package that’s easy to live with. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want engaging city driving, clever cabin tech and a touch of eco-conscious flair without giving up the fun behind the wheel.

details
P90525201_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-i
P90525196_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-i
P90525195_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-i
P90525185_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-i

Reviews BMW iX2

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Noel Fernandez G
31 May 2026, 19:14:19

I think the car looks great and is cheaper than Mercedes Benz.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dom41
19 Nov 2025, 21:04:39

Excellent electric vehicle — even in the 204 hp version, its efficiency is remarkable.

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Elroq and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to practicality versus personality in the compact crossover class. The Elroq emphasises roomy, clever packaging and value, while the C‑HR focuses on bold styling and efficient drivetrains—pick the Elroq for everyday versatility or the …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches …
Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Toyota C-HR represent two different approaches to compact crossovers: the Model Y emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and spacious practicality, while the C-HR focuses on bold styling, efficient combustion options and affordability. This comparison cuts through specs and …
Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
BMW iX2
BMW iX3
VS
The BMW iX2 and BMW iX3 go head-to-head in the compact electric-SUV ring, one flirting with city sportiness while the other favours long-distance composure. Pick the iX2 for cheeky handling and urban style, or the iX3 when range, space and relaxed motorway manners matter — either way, you get that …
BMW iX1
BMW iX2
VS
Comparing the BMW iX1 and BMW iX2 helps buyers choose between a compact electric crossover focused on practicality (iX1) and a slightly sportier, coupe-styled alternative (iX2) that emphasizes style and driving dynamics. Both share BMW’s electric tech and premium fit, but they differ in …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Ford Explorer EV
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Big, bold and fully electric, the Ford Explorer EV aims to be the long‑range road trip hero, while the Toyota C‑HR+ packs quirky styling and city‑friendly agility into a compact crossover. Choose Explorer for space and presence, C‑HR+ for economy and personality — and yes, we’ll tell you which one …
BMW iX2
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 55,600 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 15.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
476 - 512 km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,095 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
525 L
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,845 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
500 - 510 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 313 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 494 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 230 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BMW
Brand
Toyota
What drive types are available for the BMW iX2?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.