VS

BMW iX3 vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (469 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (60,800 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW iX3 or Toyota C-HR+?

BMW iX3 vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

BMW iX3

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • visibly more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h

Toyota C-HR+

  • substantially cheaper
  • somewhat more efficient
  • noticeably lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

iX3

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Toyota C-HR+ is substantially cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the BMW iX3 costs 60,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24,780 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota C-HR+ is somewhat more efficient: consuming 13.4 kWh/100km compared to 15.1 kWh/100km for the BMW iX3. That’s a difference of about 1.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the BMW iX3 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 805 km, about 198 km more than the Toyota C-HR+.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW iX3 offers noticeably more power – delivering 469 HP compared to 343 HP. That’s roughly 126 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW iX3 is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Toyota C-HR+ takes 5.2 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW iX3 delivers clearly more torque with 645 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 307 Nm more.

iX3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR+ is noticeably lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,360 kg. The difference is around 550 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries markedly more – 655 kg compared to 465 kg. That’s a difference of about 190 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 458 - 607 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota bZ4X delivers serene electric driving, a spacious, tech-forward cabin and genuine zero-emissions appeal, while the Toyota C-HR+ packages Toyota’s clever hybrid economy into a sharper, more affordable crossover with punchy urban manners. Choose the bZ4X if you want EV range and futuristic …
Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
BMW iX3
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW iX3

The BMW iX3 brings BMW's familiar SUV poise into the electric era, blending restrained styling and a comfortable, composed ride that will please traditionalists dipping their toes into electrification. It's quiet, practical and rather grown-up about going electric — a sensible choice for buyers who want BMW driving manners without the drama.

details
P90626536_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x
P90626665_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x
P90626573_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x
P90626566_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x

Reviews BMW iX3

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
Johan
20 Sept 2025, 16:15:37

Nice range, fast charging and… bidirectional charging!!

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C-HR+ mixes sharp, coupe-like styling with comfortable, surprisingly practical packaging, making a bold statement around town and on the weekend run. It’s aimed at drivers who value standout looks and fuss-free ownership over sports-car thrills, so if you want personality and reliability in one tidy package, book a test drive.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In one corner: the Tesla Model Y — the electric SUV that turned long-range EVs and futuristic tech into everyday normal, complete with ludicrously quick acceleration and a touchscreen for everything. In the other: the Toyota C-HR+ — a sharply styled, clever little crossover that prefers fuel …
Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In this head-to-head, the Škoda Elroq squares up against the quirky Toyota C-HR+, pitting Škoda’s roomy, sensible practicality against Toyota’s bold looks and city-savvy efficiency. Which one deserves your money and garage space — the value-packed family hauler or the personality-packed crossover …
BMW iX3
Porsche Macan
VS
Silent electric refinement meets petrol-fired passion: the BMW iX3 brings BMW’s EV polish and efficiency to the compact-SUV table, while the Porsche Macan remains the benchmark for engaging, analogue driving dynamics. We’ll cut through the spec sheets and showroom gloss to help you decide whether …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Kia EV4 Hatchback
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The electric Kia EV4 Hatchback — slick, tech-packed and built for range-minded commutes — goes head-to-head with the quirky, style-first Toyota C‑HR+, a compact crossover that favours personality and frugal running costs. By the end of this DriveDuel showdown we’ll tell you which one deserves your …
BMW iX2
BMW iX3
VS
The BMW iX2 and BMW iX3 go head-to-head in the compact electric-SUV ring, one flirting with city sportiness while the other favours long-distance composure. Pick the iX2 for cheeky handling and urban style, or the iX3 when range, space and relaxed motorway manners matter — either way, you get that …
BMW iX3
BMW X5
VS
Meet the BMW iX3 and the BMW X5: the iX3 is BMW’s quietly efficient all-electric mid-size SUV, while the X5 is the brand’s imposing, go-anywhere luxury SUV with traditional petrol and diesel power. Choosing between them is simple — a city-smart, lower-cost, instant-torque electric every day, or a …
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR+
VS
When the Lexus LBX squares off against the Toyota C-HR+, you're looking at badge-driven luxury versus clever value in the same compact package. We'll sort out which car looks better in the driveway, feels sharper behind the wheel, and — crucially — makes more sense for your money (spoiler: it's not …
BMW iX3
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
60,800 - 66,300 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
805 km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,360 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,895 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
465 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
469 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
645 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
345 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,026
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BMW
Brand
Toyota
What drive types are available for the BMW iX3?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.