Compare performance (326 HP vs 190 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X1 or Skoda Karoq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive landscape is teeming with choices for compact SUVs, where features such as performance, design, and technology significantly influence buyers' decisions. Two of the notable contenders in this segment are the BMW X1 and the Skoda Karoq. With distinctive qualities and a range of options, buyers may find themselves pondering which of these vehicles suits their needs best.
The BMW X1 is characterized by its robust, athletic design, measuring 4500mm in length and 1845mm in width. It stands tall at 1642mm. The X1’s bold kidney grille, sleek headlights, and sculpted lines underscore its luxury SUV status.
In contrast, the Skoda Karoq features a more understated aesthetic, measuring slightly smaller at 4390mm long and 1841mm wide. Its height varies between 1603mm to 1624mm depending on the variant. The Karoq embodies Skoda's clean design philosophy with a practical and functional exterior.
Under the hood, the BMW X1 offers a diverse range of engines, including petrol, diesel, and hybrid options. Power outputs range from 136 to a potent 326 HP, with diesel MHEV and petrol MHEV configurations available. The engines are paired with an automatic transmission, enabling smooth gear shifts and responsive performance. The X1 boasts impressive acceleration figures, with the fastest variant sprinting from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.4 seconds.
The Skoda Karoq, on the other hand, offers a more modest selection of engine options, with petrol and diesel engines generating between 115 and 190 HP. The Karoq’s acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h can reach as low as 7 seconds with its performance-oriented variants, although the overall output is fewer than that of the X1's aggressive engine range.
When it comes to fuel consumption, the BMW X1 showcases impressive figures, with some variants consuming as little as 4.6 L/100 km. Its hybrid configurations also offer an electric range of up to 83 km, providing a cost-effective and eco-friendly driving experience.
The Skoda Karoq similarly strives for efficiency, with its best-performing engines delivering figures around 4.9 L/100 km. However, its emissions tend to range from 129 to 174 g/km, slightly higher than some X1 variants, which can dip as low as 120 g/km.
Stepping inside, the BMW X1 showcases a luxurious interior with high-quality materials and an intuitive infotainment system. With five seats and a trunk capacity of up to 540 liters, it strikes a balance between comfort and practicality.
The Skoda Karoq does not shy away from comfort either, offering spacious seating for five and a trunk space of 521 liters, slightly less than the X1. Skoda is known for its attention to practicality, and the Karoq features numerous storage solutions and an easy-to-use infotainment system, making it a suitable choice for families.
Both vehicles are equipped with comprehensive safety features, including advanced driver assistance systems. The BMW X1 benefits from a suite of features such as lane-keeping assist and adaptive cruise control, amplifying its driving experience. Meanwhile, the Skoda Karoq offers similar technological advancements with a focus on safety and eco-friendliness, such as emergency braking and blind-spot monitoring.
Choosing between the BMW X1 and the Skoda Karoq ultimately boils down to personal preference and priorities. The X1 dazzles with its robust performance and luxurious stature, while the Karoq stands tall with practicality, efficiency, and value. For those who cling to sportiness and premium features, the X1 might be the right bet. Conversely, buyers seeking reliability and functionality may find the Karoq a better fit. Each vehicle brings unique strengths to the table, ensuring that either choice will provide a rewarding driving experience.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Karoq is markedly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the BMW X1 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,146 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW X1 uses 2.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Skoda Karoq with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.4 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X1 offers clearly more power – delivering 326 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 136 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X1 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Skoda Karoq takes 7 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the BMW X1 is only slightly faster – reaching 233 km/h, while the Skoda Karoq tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 23 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X1 delivers noticeably more torque with 477 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 117 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Karoq is slightly lighter – 1,380 kg compared to 1,575 kg. The difference is around 195 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BMW X1 offers marginally more boot space – 540 L compared to 521 L. That’s a difference of about 19 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Karoq offers very slightly more capacity – up to 1,630 L, about 85 L more than the BMW X1.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Karoq carries very slightly more – 549 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.
The BMW X1 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BMW X1 brings a premium feel to compact crossover life, wrapping practical space and agile handling into a tidy, upscale package. It’s ideal for buyers who want BMW driving dynamics without the bulk, offering everyday comfort and a few clever tricks to keep the commute interesting.
details
The Skoda Karoq is a smart, unfussy compact SUV that blends roomy practicality with a pleasantly composed driving character. It won’t turn heads at a car meet, but it will make daily life easier with clever storage, sensible ergonomics and a reassuringly grown-up ride.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,200 - 55,500 £
|
Price
29,100 - 41,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 7.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
81 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
14.2 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
57 - 175 g/km
|
co2
128 - 173 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,935 kg
|
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,655 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
490 - 540 L
|
Trunk capacity
521 L
|
|
Length
4,500 mm
|
Length
4,390 mm
|
|
Width
1,845 mm
|
Width
1,841 mm
|
|
Height
1,630 - 1,642 mm
|
Height
1,624 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,495 - 1,545 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,630 L
|
|
Payload
490 - 500 kg
|
Payload
456 - 549 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 326 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 - 233 km/h
|
Max Speed
192 - 210 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 240 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España