VS

BMW X3 vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (398 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (51,700 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X3 or Skoda Kodiaq?

BMW X3 vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

BMW X3

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
  • slightly lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

X3

BMW X3 vs Skoda Kodiaq: The Battle of SUV Titans

The automotive market is increasingly dominated by SUVs, and two strong competitors vying for your attention are the BMW X3 and the Skoda Kodiaq. Both vehicles offer distinct advantages in terms of performance, space, and technological innovation. This article delves into the technical aspects and innovations of both models, providing a comprehensive comparison to help potential buyers make an informed decision.

Kodiaq

Design and Aesthetics

Starting with their design, the BMW X3 boasts a more aggressive stance, featuring the brand's iconic kidney grille and sleek lines that highlight its sporty edge. The dimensions of the X3 range from 4708mm to 4755mm in length, with an overall height of approximately 1676mm. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq provides a magnetically appealing rugged look, designed to accommodate larger families with its consistently family-friendly layout. The Kodiaq measures 4758mm in length, and its height varies between 1663mm to 1683mm, reinforcing its robust character.

X3

Power and Performance

Moving to the performance aspect, the BMW X3 offers a range of powerful engine options, including Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, and Plugin Hybrid configurations, with power outputs ranging from 184 HP to a staggering 510 HP. The acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h ranges between 3.8 seconds to 8.4 seconds, showcasing an impressive array of performance. Its all-wheel-drive system ensures optimal traction in various driving conditions.

In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq offers engines ranging from traditional petrol and diesel to modern plugin hybrids, producing between 150 HP and 265 HP. While its acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h spans from 6.3 seconds to 9.7 seconds, it emphasizes a balance between efficiency and power. Both models feature an automatic transmission, but the Kodiaq utilizes a dual-clutch automatic, enhancing its shift responsiveness.

Kodiaq

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency remains critical for many buyers, and the BMW X3 presents an economical choice with combined fuel consumption figures ranging from 5.8 L/100km to 10.8 L/100km, depending on the engine variant. Notably, the plugin hybrid versions can achieve an impressive consumption rate as low as 0.9 L/100km.

Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq showcases commendable efficiency with fuel consumption figures between 5.3 L/100km to 8.2 L/100km. Its plugin hybrid model provides an electric range of up to 123 km, improving its utility for short daily commutes while minimizing CO2 emissions, making it a greener choice with emissions as low as 9 g/km for the hybrid variant.

X3

Interior and Technology

Inside, the BMW X3 is known for its luxurious feel, filled with high-quality materials and an intuitive iDrive infotainment system. Despite its classic BMW ergonomics, it offers ample trunk space measuring between 450L to 570L, making it practical for everyday use.

The Skoda Kodiaq, similarly, is spacious, offering an impressive trunk capacity of up to 910L. Skoda’s typical ‘Simply Clever’ features improve the overall usability of the interior. Its infotainment system is user-friendly, but lacks some of the high-end feel found in the BMW.

Kodiaq

Safety and Assistance Features

In terms of safety, both SUVs come equipped with a suite of advanced driver assistance systems. The BMW X3 includes features such as lane departure warning, adaptive cruise control, and forward collision warning. Skoda Kodiaq likewise is equipped with key safety technologies, including automatic emergency braking and blind-spot monitoring, emphasizing its family-friendly focus.

X3

Conclusion: Which SUV Should You Choose?

Ultimately, the choice between the BMW X3 and the Skoda Kodiaq boils down to individual needs and preferences. If you’re seeking luxury, performance, and an extensive array of engine options, the BMW X3 may be the right fit. However, for those prioritizing space, value for money, and family-oriented features, the Skoda Kodiaq shines as a compelling alternative. Whichever you prefer, both these SUVs epitomize the best that the automotive world has to offer in terms of technology and innovation.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Enyaq is the slick, silent EV that turns everyday driving into a techy, whisper-quiet commute, while the Skoda Kodiaq remains the go-anywhere, seven-seat family SUV that swallows luggage and trailers without complaint. Choose the Enyaq for lower running costs, a modern cabin and …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Kodiaq is markedly cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the BMW X3 costs 51,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,808 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the BMW X3 with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 34 km more than the BMW X3.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X3 offers markedly more power – delivering 398 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X3 delivers considerably more torque with 670 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 270 Nm more.

X3

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is slightly lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 1,930 kg. The difference is around 246 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeably more boot space – 910 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 340 L.

When it comes to payload, the BMW X3 carries only slightly more – 570 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 7 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details
BMW X3
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW X3

The BMW X3 mixes Bavarian poise with everyday practicality, delivering a composed ride and a cabin that feels both premium and lived-in. It’s the sort of SUV that lets you enjoy sporty handling without sacrificing family-friendly space, so you get fun and sense in one neat package.

details
P90444059_highRes_bmw-x3-xdrive30d-11-
P90424715_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv
P90424688_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv
P90424707_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv
P90424709_highRes_the-new-bmw-x3-xdriv

Reviews BMW X3

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its spacious interior and efficient performance, making it an ideal choice for families. Meanwhile, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers a robust off-road capability and a plug-in hybrid option, appealing to those seeking versatility in …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing …
Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
BMW X3
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
51,700 - 73,000 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
88 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
64 - 175 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,930 - 2,140 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
460 - 570 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
4,758 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
Payload
570 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
197 - 398 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
226 km/h
Torque
330 - 670 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
145 - 293 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
BMW
Brand
Skoda
Is the BMW X3 offered with different drivetrains?

The BMW X3 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.