In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the BMW X3 stands out with its luxurious interior and sporty performance, appealing to drivers who prioritize a premium driving experience. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq offers practicality and spaciousness, making it an excellent choice for families looking for versatility and value. While the X3 emphasizes dynamic handling and advanced technology, the Kodiaq excels in providing ample cargo space and user-friendly features, catering to differing needs within the growing SUV market.
The automotive market is increasingly dominated by SUVs, and two strong competitors vying for your attention are the BMW X3 and the Skoda Kodiaq. Both vehicles offer distinct advantages in terms of performance, space, and technological innovation. This article delves into the technical aspects and innovations of both models, providing a comprehensive comparison to help potential buyers make an informed decision.
Starting with their design, the BMW X3 boasts a more aggressive stance, featuring the brand's iconic kidney grille and sleek lines that highlight its sporty edge. The dimensions of the X3 range from 4708mm to 4755mm in length, with an overall height of approximately 1676mm. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq provides a magnetically appealing rugged look, designed to accommodate larger families with its consistently family-friendly layout. The Kodiaq measures 4758mm in length, and its height varies between 1663mm to 1683mm, reinforcing its robust character.
Moving to the performance aspect, the BMW X3 offers a range of powerful engine options, including Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, and Plugin Hybrid configurations, with power outputs ranging from 184 HP to a staggering 510 HP. The acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h ranges between 3.8 seconds to 8.4 seconds, showcasing an impressive array of performance. Its all-wheel-drive system ensures optimal traction in various driving conditions.
In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq offers engines ranging from traditional petrol and diesel to modern plugin hybrids, producing between 150 HP and 265 HP. While its acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h spans from 6.3 seconds to 9.7 seconds, it emphasizes a balance between efficiency and power. Both models feature an automatic transmission, but the Kodiaq utilizes a dual-clutch automatic, enhancing its shift responsiveness.
Fuel efficiency remains critical for many buyers, and the BMW X3 presents an economical choice with combined fuel consumption figures ranging from 5.8 L/100km to 10.8 L/100km, depending on the engine variant. Notably, the plugin hybrid versions can achieve an impressive consumption rate as low as 0.9 L/100km.
Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq showcases commendable efficiency with fuel consumption figures between 5.3 L/100km to 8.2 L/100km. Its plugin hybrid model provides an electric range of up to 123 km, improving its utility for short daily commutes while minimizing CO2 emissions, making it a greener choice with emissions as low as 9 g/km for the hybrid variant.
Inside, the BMW X3 is known for its luxurious feel, filled with high-quality materials and an intuitive iDrive infotainment system. Despite its classic BMW ergonomics, it offers ample trunk space measuring between 450L to 570L, making it practical for everyday use.
The Skoda Kodiaq, similarly, is spacious, offering an impressive trunk capacity of up to 910L. Skoda’s typical ‘Simply Clever’ features improve the overall usability of the interior. Its infotainment system is user-friendly, but lacks some of the high-end feel found in the BMW.
In terms of safety, both SUVs come equipped with a suite of advanced driver assistance systems. The BMW X3 includes features such as lane departure warning, adaptive cruise control, and forward collision warning. Skoda Kodiaq likewise is equipped with key safety technologies, including automatic emergency braking and blind-spot monitoring, emphasizing its family-friendly focus.
Ultimately, the choice between the BMW X3 and the Skoda Kodiaq boils down to individual needs and preferences. If you’re seeking luxury, performance, and an extensive array of engine options, the BMW X3 may be the right fit. However, for those prioritizing space, value for money, and family-oriented features, the Skoda Kodiaq shines as a compelling alternative. Whichever you prefer, both these SUVs epitomize the best that the automotive world has to offer in terms of technology and innovation.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 47900 - 90300
£
|
Price
about 36000 - 49600
£
|
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 10.8
L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
44 - 90
km
|
Electric Range
113 - 123
km
|
Battery Capacity
11.2 - 19.7
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
19.7
kWh
|
co2
21 - 246
g/km
|
co2
9 - 186
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 68
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1875 - 2140
kg
|
Curb weight
1661 - 1859
kg
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 570
L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910
L
|
Length
4708 - 4755
mm
|
Length
4758 - 4761
mm
|
Width
1891 - 1920
mm
|
Width
1864
mm
|
Height
1660 - 1676
mm
|
Height
1663 - 1683
mm
|
Payload
415 - 585
kg
|
Payload
497 - 538
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Automatikgetriebe
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
184 - 510
HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 8.4
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7
s
|
Max Speed
210 - 250
km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 231
km/h
|
Torque
300 - 700
Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
135 - 375
kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195
kW
|
Engine capacity
1995 - 2998
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
210 - 250
km/h
|
Top speed
205 - 231
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B, G, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, G
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.