@ BMW Group Press
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
VS

BMW X3 vs Skoda Kodiaq – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether BMW X3 or Skoda Kodiaq fits your lifestyle better.

X3 @ BMW Group Press

BMW X3 vs Skoda Kodiaq: The Battle of SUV Titans

The automotive market is increasingly dominated by SUVs, and two strong competitors vying for your attention are the BMW X3 and the Skoda Kodiaq. Both vehicles offer distinct advantages in terms of performance, space, and technological innovation. This article delves into the technical aspects and innovations of both models, providing a comprehensive comparison to help potential buyers make an informed decision.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Design and Aesthetics

Starting with their design, the BMW X3 boasts a more aggressive stance, featuring the brand's iconic kidney grille and sleek lines that highlight its sporty edge. The dimensions of the X3 range from 4708mm to 4755mm in length, with an overall height of approximately 1676mm. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq provides a magnetically appealing rugged look, designed to accommodate larger families with its consistently family-friendly layout. The Kodiaq measures 4758mm in length, and its height varies between 1663mm to 1683mm, reinforcing its robust character.

X3 @ BMW Group Press

Power and Performance

Moving to the performance aspect, the BMW X3 offers a range of powerful engine options, including Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, and Plugin Hybrid configurations, with power outputs ranging from 184 HP to a staggering 510 HP. The acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h ranges between 3.8 seconds to 8.4 seconds, showcasing an impressive array of performance. Its all-wheel-drive system ensures optimal traction in various driving conditions.

In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq offers engines ranging from traditional petrol and diesel to modern plugin hybrids, producing between 150 HP and 265 HP. While its acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h spans from 6.3 seconds to 9.7 seconds, it emphasizes a balance between efficiency and power. Both models feature an automatic transmission, but the Kodiaq utilizes a dual-clutch automatic, enhancing its shift responsiveness.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency remains critical for many buyers, and the BMW X3 presents an economical choice with combined fuel consumption figures ranging from 5.8 L/100km to 10.8 L/100km, depending on the engine variant. Notably, the plugin hybrid versions can achieve an impressive consumption rate as low as 0.9 L/100km.

Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq showcases commendable efficiency with fuel consumption figures between 5.3 L/100km to 8.2 L/100km. Its plugin hybrid model provides an electric range of up to 123 km, improving its utility for short daily commutes while minimizing CO2 emissions, making it a greener choice with emissions as low as 9 g/km for the hybrid variant.

X3 @ BMW Group Press

Interior and Technology

Inside, the BMW X3 is known for its luxurious feel, filled with high-quality materials and an intuitive iDrive infotainment system. Despite its classic BMW ergonomics, it offers ample trunk space measuring between 450L to 570L, making it practical for everyday use.

The Skoda Kodiaq, similarly, is spacious, offering an impressive trunk capacity of up to 910L. Skoda’s typical ‘Simply Clever’ features improve the overall usability of the interior. Its infotainment system is user-friendly, but lacks some of the high-end feel found in the BMW.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Safety and Assistance Features

In terms of safety, both SUVs come equipped with a suite of advanced driver assistance systems. The BMW X3 includes features such as lane departure warning, adaptive cruise control, and forward collision warning. Skoda Kodiaq likewise is equipped with key safety technologies, including automatic emergency braking and blind-spot monitoring, emphasizing its family-friendly focus.

X3 @ BMW Group Press

Conclusion: Which SUV Should You Choose?

Ultimately, the choice between the BMW X3 and the Skoda Kodiaq boils down to individual needs and preferences. If you’re seeking luxury, performance, and an extensive array of engine options, the BMW X3 may be the right fit. However, for those prioritizing space, value for money, and family-oriented features, the Skoda Kodiaq shines as a compelling alternative. Whichever you prefer, both these SUVs epitomize the best that the automotive world has to offer in terms of technology and innovation.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Kodiaq has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the BMW X3 costs 51300 £. That’s a price difference of around 14409 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the BMW X3 with 2.80 L. The difference is about 2.40 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – achieving up to 123 km, about 35 km more than the BMW X3.

X3 @ BMW Group Press

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X3 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 398 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X3 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the BMW X3 performs minimal better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Skoda Kodiaq tops out at 231 km/h. The difference is around 19 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: BMW X3 pulls significantly stronger with 670 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 270 Nm difference.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is a bit lighter – 1684 kg compared to 1930 kg. The difference is around 246 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeable more room – 910 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 340 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs slightly better – up to 2105 L, which is about 405 L more than the BMW X3.

When it comes to payload, BMW X3 hardly perceptible takes the win – 570 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 7 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £36,800
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.4 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 113 - 123 km

BMW X3

The BMW X3 mixes Bavarian poise with everyday practicality, delivering a composed ride and a cabin that feels both premium and lived-in. It’s the sort of SUV that lets you enjoy sporty handling without sacrificing family-friendly space, so you get fun and sense in one neat package.

details

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)
rate

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
BMW X3
Skoda Kodiaq
X3 @ BMW Group Press
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Consumption

Price
51300 - 72400 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.7 L
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
88 km
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
64 - 175 g/km
co2
9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 65 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1930 - 2140 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
460 - 570 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
4755 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
1920 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1660 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1600 - 1700 L
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Payload
570 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
197 - 398 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
215 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
330 - 670 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
145 - 293 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1995 - 2998 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General

Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
Brand
BMW
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the BMW X3?

The BMW X3 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.