VS

BYD Atto 3 vs Dacia Spring comparison

Compare performance (449 HP vs 102 HP), boot space and price (38,600 £ vs 14,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Dacia Spring?

BYD Atto 3 vs Dacia Spring: Key differences

BYD Atto 3

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

Dacia Spring

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Atto 3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Dacia Spring is considerably cheaper – starting at 14,500 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24,077 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Dacia Spring is visibly more efficient: consuming 12.4 kWh/100km compared to 16.4 kWh/100km for the BYD Atto 3. That’s a difference of about 4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the BYD Atto 3 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 285 km more than the Dacia Spring.

Spring

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers considerably more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 102 HP. That’s roughly 347 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Dacia Spring takes 9.6 s. That’s about 5.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 3 delivers significantly more torque with 560 Nm compared to 137 Nm. That’s about 423 Nm more.

Atto 3

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: BYD Atto 3 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Dacia Spring is considerably lighter – 1,070 kg compared to 1,880 kg. The difference is around 810 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BYD Atto 3 offers markedly more boot space – 490 L compared to 308 L. That’s a difference of about 182 L.

When it comes to payload, the BYD Atto 3 carries considerably more – 530 kg compared to 274 kg. That’s a difference of about 256 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BYD Atto 3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,600
Atto 3

BYD Atto 3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 313 - 449 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 510 km
BYD Atto 3
Dacia Spring

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 is an electric crossover that blends a distinctive, modern design with a comfortable, well-equipped cabin suited to everyday family use. It offers a relaxed, smooth driving feel and practical running costs, making it a sensible choice if you want an uncomplicated, value-focused EV.

details

Dacia Spring

The Dacia Spring is an unpretentious city electric that strips EV ownership down to the essentials, offering clean, fuss-free transport for daily urban life. It won't impress luxury-seekers, but its cheerful practicality and rock-bottom running costs make it a clever, no-nonsense choice for anyone who wants electric mobility without the drama.

details
BYD Atto 3
Dacia Spring

Costs and Consumption

Price
38,600 - 43,700 £
Price
14,500 - 16,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
12.4 - 12.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 510 km
Electric Range
221 - 225 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,880 - 1,990 kg
Curb weight
1,070 kg
Trunk capacity
490 L
Trunk capacity
308 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,875 mm
Width
1,583 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
530 kg
Payload
274 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
313 - 449 HP
Power HP
70 - 102 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.6 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 560 Nm
Torque
137 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
230 - 330 kW
Power kW
52 - 75 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BYD
Brand
Dacia
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.