Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BYD Atto 3 vs Volvo EX40 comparison
Compare performance (449 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Volvo EX40?
BYD Atto 3 vs Volvo EX40: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Atto 3
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
BYD Atto 3 is visibly cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Volvo EX40 costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,428 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the BYD Atto 3 is very slightly more efficient: consuming 16 kWh/100km compared to 16.6 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX40. That’s a difference of about 0.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo EX40 offers moderately more range – reaching up to 576 km, about 66 km more than the BYD Atto 3.
EX40
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers marginally more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 442 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Volvo EX40 takes 4.6 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Volvo EX40 is moderately faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the BYD Atto 3 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX40 delivers a bit more torque with 670 Nm compared to 560 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.
Atto 3
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BYD Atto 3 is moderately lighter – 1,825 kg compared to 2,040 kg. The difference is around 215 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BYD Atto 3 offers very slightly more boot space – 440 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Volvo EX40 offers only slightly more capacity – up to 1,400 L, about 62 L more than the BYD Atto 3.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX40 carries clearly more – 480 kg compared to 335 kg. That’s a difference of about 145 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo EX40 is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £42,800
Volvo EX40
BYD Atto 3
Volvo EX40
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
BYD Atto 3
The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.
details
Volvo EX40
The Volvo EX40 wraps Scandinavian calm and clever practicality into a compact electric package that feels both premium and refreshingly uncomplicated. It's the grown-up answer to flashier rivals — a safe, comfy, and city-friendly EV with thoughtful tech that makes everyday driving quietly satisfying.
details
BYD Atto 3
Volvo EX40
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33,400 - 43,700 £
|
Price
42,800 - 58,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
420 - 510 km
|
Electric Range
480 - 576 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,825 kg
|
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,170 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
Trunk capacity
410 L
|
|
Length
4,455 mm
|
Length
4,440 mm
|
|
Width
1,875 mm
|
Width
1,863 mm
|
|
Height
1,615 mm
|
Height
1,647 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,338 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,400 L
|
|
Payload
335 kg
|
Payload
430 - 480 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 449 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 7.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 560 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 330 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.